From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <thomas@thomaszander.se>) id 1Xi8Bb-0006rT-In
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sat, 25 Oct 2014 20:43:43 +0000
X-ACL-Warn: 
Received: from bouvier.getmail.no ([84.210.184.8])
	by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	id 1Xi8Ba-0002Be-3a for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sat, 25 Oct 2014 20:43:43 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by bouvier.getmail.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4B16408F1
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Sat, 25 Oct 2014 22:43:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bouvier.getmail.no ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (bouvier.get.c.bitbit.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10032) with ESMTP id nTSkCvUgQ62D
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Sat, 25 Oct 2014 22:43:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by bouvier.getmail.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4D8540F60
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Sat, 25 Oct 2014 22:43:25 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at bouvier.get.c.bitbit.net
Received: from bouvier.getmail.no ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (bouvier.get.c.bitbit.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10026) with ESMTP id yY5a0o0u-3S2
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Sat, 25 Oct 2014 22:43:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from coldstorage.localnet (cm-84.208.97.23.getinternet.no
	[84.208.97.23])
	by bouvier.getmail.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5F12408F1
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Sat, 25 Oct 2014 22:43:25 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Zander <thomas@thomaszander.se>
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 22:43:22 +0200
Message-ID: <10121957.9n901UckJt@coldstorage>
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.1 (Linux/3.16-2-amd64; KDE/4.14.1; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <CALqxMTGWXkL3wPSVSDr7=R5KsSiHpwjXQO-k+EEk8KvLePv0rQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAE28kUS-uDbd_Br3H5BxwRm1PZFpOwLhcyyZT9b1_VfRaBC9jw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALqxMTGWXkL3wPSVSDr7=R5KsSiHpwjXQO-k+EEk8KvLePv0rQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
X-Headers-End: 1Xi8Ba-0002Be-3a
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] death by halving
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 20:43:43 -0000

On Saturday 25. October 2014 13.27.30 Adam Back wrote:
> - alternatively you might say why not 1/100th reward reduction per 2
> week period rather than 1/2 every 4 years, a difficulty retarget could
> be a convenient point to do that.

mining equipment has a much shorter lifetime than 4 years, so the halving 
makes it easy to base purchases on.
Also, divide by two is the cleanest way to get to zero after a specific amount 
of divisions.