From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6060E98C for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 22:09:06 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: delayed 00:06:16 by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from smtprelay06.ispgateway.de (smtprelay06.ispgateway.de [80.67.18.29]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB9E3AA for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 22:09:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [89.13.169.254] (helo=anonymous) by smtprelay06.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1ZxMWT-0002RK-Q7 for bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 23:08:45 +0100 From: xor To: Bitcoin Dev Reply-To: xor@freenetproject.org Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 23:08:55 +0100 Message-ID: <11064196.Mmtap3aOyl@1337h4x0r> Organization: Freenet Project User-Agent: KMail/4.13.3 (Linux/3.13.0-68-generic; KDE/4.13.3; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <1581446.3ZPnhFUSFq@1337h4x0r> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2787838.6JNxkIICkb"; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Df-Sender: eG9yQGZyZWVtYWlsLmJvZ2VydC5kZQ== X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 14 Nov 2015 08:08:47 +0000 Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Contradiction in BIP65 text? X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 22:09:06 -0000 --nextPart2787838.6JNxkIICkb Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Friday, November 13, 2015 09:53:57 PM Gregory Maxwell wrote: > The first text is explaining nlocktime without BIP65 in order to > explain the reason for having BIP65. Thanks. I would recommend changing the BIP65 to clarify what you just said, this clearly is the missing piece of information there. --nextPart2787838.6JNxkIICkb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABCAAGBQJWRl98AAoJEMtmZ+8tjWt5mVEP+wakquH0BE46L3DS0Srw7wZd IzC6pWwfsexPyzReWUrch0AjmVn6b0MkYvt0wUvCnLwtwLR1b5i2O8oeZ0TiYh4d /nHP8YRAvcUJ/NjDjBuyKI47dXXWtL1+8K4Ey1pS7CRZJTIu0gbHbPjj97FuiHEY 0uG3nBU9d73t7oOkjNdEzJ9Dkbgjz919PuO4Ny1ydsTbxWcDEorTeTfINavGEau4 ai2DtoRoZUZNFzpIRRm9uKMavc/CZvEEkH+J9sGBYYkTKTfBuCIHMuF64tdTMXz1 eU0QNCuAi8tEOKYUFsSoCy9WK9vkZMgJ/iK2/MBLxH2fv9HQ08eUUZaYB1tDKGu5 mnN/AQ5s1nYpNUl1lXwF+vHLt10VFK9VvIHxTzS3A20jVu6HqKMlR4x8JInNOGWp 7g4LkPnf3UocoTRrXx0fXiLGAPX3B/4gwRV0B26MKvcqRw+8LYI9kNIpYWL+v7BP 9L16jYsjVy0BlChnuGou74tTB9ixZmdV+CRYmdcobfRj69zKeNtCxZf/OvdR9LUp TfaFtSkbHSuKkk//j2S/htVCTK7QaO45j8DIX4qRVrxeQ2PTaalvJY2J9fBjhrSO wYhUGMjI7ivcvrvwog1CfgbbnjQ/zD4IfYcVT3OejtjgwNTO2EqtB77/IwqCXhMk PVR0dP8OlvXWE/0PXPVO =g9Qg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2787838.6JNxkIICkb--