From: Matt Corallo <bitcoin-list@bluematt.me>
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] 0.3.24
Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2011 02:46:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1309567578.2541.26.camel@Desktop666> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=zG4o5igBFX=4Yg340B0QGF42RBQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1915 bytes --]
Personally, I have little preference, sipa and gmaxwell fall on the side
of cherry-pick, but I think it might be good to do a broad-base test of
CWallet in 0.3.24 so potential bugs can be found in it before crypto and
0.4. In either case, I dont think we should spend too much time as this
is just a minor update release, just get it out the door so we can focus
on 0.4 (hopefully) without interruption.
Matt
On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 20:37 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Hum, it sounds like there was some misunderstanding, on my part at
> least. On IRC, people are talking about a cherry-picked release,
> basically 0.3.23 + a couple specific fixes, rather than what is
> current in upstream git. I had assumed people meant releasing current
> git + some specific fixes not yet in git.
>
> Wearing the Release Mangler hat, cherry-picked branches have a few
> disadvantages:
>
> * you're throwing away the testing people have done on upstream git
> * the new branch would have zero testing, as most people have been
> testing 0.3.23 or upstream git
> * it would be a dead-end branch, never touched after release. bug
> reports for such a release might not necessarily be applicable to last
> version or current upstream or anywhere in between.
>
> That is the convention wisdom, anyway. But to paraphrase Pirates of
> the Caribbean, release management rules aren't really rules, they're
> more like... guidelines. :)
>
> The cherry-picked 0.3.24 release, according to IRC wisdom, wouldn't
> have to worry about shipping CWallet, which needs a fix or two from
> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/358
>
> I can live with, and roll a release for, either (a) 0.3.23 + select
> fixes or (b) current upstream + pull #358. My preference is (b), but
> this is a community and Holy Alpaca decision, not just a call I will
> make on my own.
>
> Comments welcome...
>
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-02 0:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-01 0:07 [Bitcoin-development] 0.3.24 Matt Corallo
2011-07-01 2:07 ` Gregory Maxwell
2011-07-01 2:44 ` Douglas Huff
2011-07-01 12:41 ` Douglas Huff
2011-07-01 8:00 ` Pieter Wuille
2011-07-01 8:39 ` Jeff Garzik
2011-07-01 12:31 ` Gavin Andresen
2011-07-01 12:40 ` Matt Corallo
2011-07-01 15:06 ` Gavin Andresen
2011-07-01 16:35 ` jan
2011-07-01 16:47 ` Robert McKay
2011-07-01 17:47 ` Douglas Huff
2011-07-01 17:50 ` Matt Corallo
2011-07-01 17:52 ` Douglas Huff
2011-07-01 22:03 ` Matt Corallo
2011-07-01 22:07 ` Douglas Huff
2011-07-01 17:59 ` Gregory Maxwell
2011-07-01 23:42 ` Jeff Garzik
2011-07-02 0:37 ` Jeff Garzik
2011-07-02 0:46 ` Matt Corallo [this message]
2011-07-02 0:51 ` Gregory Maxwell
2011-07-02 1:05 ` Douglas Huff
2011-07-02 1:12 ` Matt Corallo
2011-07-02 2:05 ` Gavin Andresen
2011-07-02 21:07 ` Jeff Garzik
2011-07-03 1:58 ` Matt Corallo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1309567578.2541.26.camel@Desktop666 \
--to=bitcoin-list@bluematt.me \
--cc=bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox