From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RPh2x-0006ln-Ox for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 20:52:59 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from nm4-vm6.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([98.138.91.97]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with smtp (Exim 4.76) id 1RPh2w-0006q1-Hu for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 20:52:59 +0000 Received: from [98.138.90.51] by nm4.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Nov 2011 20:52:53 -0000 Received: from [98.138.89.250] by tm4.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Nov 2011 20:52:53 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1042.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Nov 2011 20:52:53 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-5 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 283389.29001.bm@omp1042.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 76790 invoked by uid 60001); 13 Nov 2011 20:52:53 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: AfJAO0EVM1laVYUidNGrW7DOaVTQFGQ3WeOGhpOoFYU4qg0 xWeQE.upEbmKoVeTWOoxSKDBBkelzZxAI5P5xE8xhrbV5yXm3e9UkBC5DPVy cWBiUhsufSFL5cQSibXOPJOoPQbqjq.rIHW5zBH7uS4nL_GNG7YjddZaDWwb uAYl21BEVThNRgJhu78SlVxNILqMaoh0jDLwEflX8LDC8S.TnwFqwwigtZ8A UGD528hl_2PKtcQMTmXrK3ngkgV9LCpNlztpQQvS2._BqNeC6HzpT5LikwTC ddgFy39IB_UI6prqoiBiMLraGceG8drw0rb_cblqzDn_v2COMfaWlcUT8Wb2 ZazyPqTSHIIY5cTv9AjADuaj4QVA8vq7185t56wvJynErWWU.qB1AxI4cAth t3fAh2R3OF7y47.F2XnHBb6gauTAdpIaqvj7V5K__tbBV3KKIn3HrIOuxVpR n8H.2gL4B5ZWABG_94yAqzCTDSLHKtoNVShC7Eyb7d4ANA37eLJ660OlR43V PKXtsxFn2JFR_FDwoT2EQHDtiLuqzRM3tP0swk.EHUBhqsNEdk8OjGFDCqC_ 9eEVFn2WRHdY_Pss1TE8fzN2AwAjIDe2d Received: from [92.20.140.148] by web121004.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 12:52:53 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.115.325013 References: <1320959761.36702.YahooMailNeo@web121014.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1321217573.68019.YahooMailNeo@web121004.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 12:52:53 -0800 (PST) From: Amir Taaki To: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-1562933420-663335862-1321217573=:68019" X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (zgenjix[at]yahoo.com) -1.2 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [98.138.91.97 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1RPh2w-0006q1-Hu Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] [RFC] BIP 14 - Protocol Version and User Agent X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: Amir Taaki List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 20:52:59 -0000 ---1562933420-663335862-1321217573=:68019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Nice. I'll check with justmoon when I hopefully meet him at the conference. If all is OK, hopefully 0.6 will be the last protocol version bump for a while. ________________________________ From: Mike Hearn To: Amir Taaki Cc: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net" Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 7:31 PM Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] [RFC] BIP 14 - Protocol Version and User Agent Looks pretty reasonable to me. If Gavin changes the mainline client to use this format I'll change BitcoinJ as well. It'll need a bit of API work so clients are sure to set it up properly. On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Amir Taaki wrote: Hi, > > >https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/BIP_0014 > > >Thanks to Gavin Andresen for proof reading and suggesting clarifications. Thanks to Patrick Strateman for suggesting the hierarchical format and pointing out some flaws of browser user-agents to me. > > >The timeline is written in the past tense since BIPs are meant to be readable in the future for explaining why we took certain decisions with bitcoin. A nice cache for future historians when bitcoin is ubiquitous ;) > > > >The next version 0.6 should be the protocol version which becomes peeled off from the current client. There are still some changes migrating into the protocol that need to be finished. > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >RSA(R) Conference 2012 >Save $700 by Nov 18 >Register now >http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 >_______________________________________________ >Bitcoin-development mailing list >Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development > > ---1562933420-663335862-1321217573=:68019 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Nice. I'll check with justmoon when I hopefully meet him at the conference. If all is OK, hopefully 0.6 will be the last protocol version bump for a while.

From: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
To: Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com>
Cc: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net" <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 7:31 PM
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] [RFC] BIP 14 - Protocol Version and User Agent

Looks pretty reasonable to me. If Gavin changes the mainline client to use this format I'll change BitcoinJ as well. It'll need a bit of API work so clients are sure to set it up properly.

On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com> wrote:
Hi,


Thanks to Gavin Andresen for proof reading and suggesting clarifications. Thanks to Patrick Strateman for suggesting the hierarchical format and pointing out some flaws of browser user-agents to me.

The timeline is written in the past tense since BIPs are meant to be readable in the future for explaining why we took certain decisions with bitcoin. A nice cache for future historians when bitcoin is ubiquitous ;)

The next version 0.6 should be the protocol version which becomes peeled off from the current client. There are still some changes migrating into the protocol that need to be finished.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development




---1562933420-663335862-1321217573=:68019--