From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RqudS-0007Ot-VK for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 22:51:10 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from nm12-vm1.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([98.138.91.41]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with smtp (Exim 4.76) id 1RqudS-0006BG-6b for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 22:51:10 +0000 Received: from [98.138.90.52] by nm12.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Jan 2012 22:51:04 -0000 Received: from [98.138.89.169] by tm5.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Jan 2012 22:51:04 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1025.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Jan 2012 22:51:04 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 456241.52357.bm@omp1025.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 32261 invoked by uid 60001); 27 Jan 2012 22:51:04 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: KfC2FCsVM1lpNg_avpsWVpCy0kdoSTb1KO7pKnbcGk_Kt.x n.G66Ys9WLJiJgVIa9KA01XmJbpPKjtxcrJtW5aD1cqDLDmw9BBHgWU6l4jn 7pAfIlFAqTApLDZOyMafehjh5qObMZ6D5G7Qnps4uS9PuGA.5B0IZGFsBwCc e80OxMKGAUYogeaxMVdqHijuKIVF0kgRet7etY1fPk6meJGI2x1Z7keCGwJw Taf0jYlz5YeJIfGPZxGxG7igesOyzSoN3.Ha88uNU1lgXhS_3m9cW.N2poxH c6nCio7QA0xV2PD.jZDZAB6yuqofB6vpw5ZGIh9vkW3fQVzYWMIynBEF80m8 Qx0OM1G3hnDk5hA3klySgcpKcMF2bHafH9UgdOZ3vkpwEYCf5ATaF6T.HeA- - Received: from [92.20.138.208] by web121003.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:51:04 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.116.331537 Message-ID: <1327704664.31621.YahooMailNeo@web121003.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:51:04 -0800 (PST) From: Amir Taaki To: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-2027350018-185279707-1327704664=:31621" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [98.138.91.41 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (zgenjix[at]yahoo.com) -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.4 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-Headers-End: 1RqudS-0006BG-6b Subject: [Bitcoin-development] BIP 0020: URI Scheme X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: Amir Taaki List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 22:51:11 -0000 ---2027350018-185279707-1327704664=:31621 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii BIP 0020 is the old URI scheme BIPisized. ATM it is Draft status. I do not know enough about the discussion back last year to know whether to move it to Accepted status or not. My feelings are that having a re-decision (even if it was accepted last year) is healthy since it makes no sense to have a standard before a standardisation process existed. For now, it is Draft status until there's a general agreement. ---2027350018-185279707-1327704664=:31621 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
BIP 0020 is the old URI scheme BIPisized.

ATM it is Draft status.

I do not know enough about the discussion back last year to know whether to move it to Accepted status or not. My feelings are that having a re-decision (even if it was accepted last year) is healthy since it makes no sense to have a standard before a standardisation process existed.

For now, it is Draft status until there's a general agreement.

---2027350018-185279707-1327704664=:31621--