From: Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com>
To: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net"
<bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: [Bitcoin-development] JSON-RPC is BIP territory or not?
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 10:51:41 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1330714301.3840.YahooMailNeo@web121006.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1261 bytes --]
Hi,
I got sent this BIP:
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/BIP_DRAFT:_getmemorypool#JSON-RPC_Method:_getmemorypool
What is your opinion on this? Is it BIP related?
It is a implementation-specific non-bitcoin-protocol proposal. My understanding of BIPs is that
they apply across bitcoin implementations and largely focus on the most generic use-cases
(like the URIs) and the protocol. Things which affect all clients, and allow the system to function
as a united whole.
That BIPs especially focus on the protocol, and that something like this is outside the mandate
of the BIP process.
For instance, we could imagine a future scenario. Bitcoin-Qt is currently based off bitcoind's
codebase. However wumpus built the client in mind with an abstraction layer to enable multiple
backends (a good design). In our hypothetical situation, there are 3 different backend codebases
using Bitcoin-Qt. I do not think a proposal to mandate a changing to Bitcoin-Qt's abstraction
layer or a change in the UI placement would be appropriate BIP material.
OTOH, many clients do need to make use of URIs and the BIP process is totally correct, as it
standardises a behaviour which is needed for interoperability of the network and community.
Thoughts?
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1821 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2012-03-02 18:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-02 18:51 Amir Taaki [this message]
2012-03-02 19:14 ` [Bitcoin-development] JSON-RPC is BIP territory or not? Luke-Jr
2012-03-03 13:44 ` Stefan Thomas
2012-03-03 13:49 ` Luke-Jr
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1330714301.3840.YahooMailNeo@web121006.mail.ne1.yahoo.com \
--to=zgenjix@yahoo.com \
--cc=bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox