From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SOvNO-0001BH-6k for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 18:31:10 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from nm34-vm1.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([98.138.229.81]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with smtp (Exim 4.76) id 1SOvNN-0002Gi-CJ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 18:31:10 +0000 Received: from [98.138.90.50] by nm34.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Apr 2012 18:31:03 -0000 Received: from [98.138.89.193] by tm3.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Apr 2012 18:31:03 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1051.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Apr 2012 18:31:03 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 923963.32456.bm@omp1051.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 44195 invoked by uid 60001); 30 Apr 2012 18:31:03 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: Fo3c6koVM1mzNL9smrlHJGseqxi2o9DG1LjAdNttwF4vTjE j_TJ1cIaXpsbnge2Q6C4zwdk.iL5Y2AGU8_KL3UUtUBLCUBlDHnf0SVSgJ1h LGrtKIzXIkKs6V4vZYQ60Zqkl17fByylx6I9wipP2_eRFPhnX8lmXqJHGkri yh7qwqKO.2edr59dvVcOXO_0CfFCGIlkulaJDlTBA1vh7YvCGQZV4Zxy0N.Q yyqvBH3umVsoapVB7J3Pm5KhzXZoH1y4y4SkY9699JliCYMZOzIqj9Py8h99 1IJ0L_rUcc110DTEDpOSH7AxtVtqZnNSiqZUe6zPv.AhPxmTcFosKeW0ev3u z4c.tknjSZ5RS68pEtj9Tl9PRIWrzUvgRz8sHLywcLBn_xz0ki89y2mZ9klk 5K96cTh.AossVZbjh5iKsWCC.iCpkc8Ix2XZ8JEHPRIATJXK6W4BQtvO036D rYYbozeJLbbbeTCdryko1nROcwFb9q2alW6o9D2UfYBMnrdW0mxFFKThp5fS IWmTcuo27lUmEo_7VG4fJBhNxcu.qR7ESAJBnu3STX61ExE1pbYpDdWN7UC3 RHWlt.gS2x3tz5sG_nnb4Czun5YbbfbVKNd4ylhnT8HT4VAVMo6_7jTGOgTx .wMh5abqrWjc- Received: from [92.20.187.109] by web121007.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:31:03 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.118.349524 References: <1335808239.18613.YahooMailNeo@web121006.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1335810663.39838.YahooMailNeo@web121007.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:31:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Amir Taaki To: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [98.138.229.81 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (zgenjix[at]yahoo.com) -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-Headers-End: 1SOvNN-0002Gi-CJ Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] new bitcoin.org clients page X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: Amir Taaki List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 18:31:10 -0000 Are we looking at the same list? Because here is the order I added: Bitcoin= -Qt, Armory, Electrum and MultiBit. Maybe try CTRL-F5 to force a refresh of= your browser.=0A=0AAlso about the descriptions: yeah I know. I think it's = better to put this up first and then have everyone submit their own descrip= tions and screenshots. Otherwise it'll be a nightmare to coordinate until e= verything is perfect. I did message you on IRC today but maybe you were off= line.=0A=0AI didn't copy paste the Armory description from the website beca= use it really sounds too spammy like a sales pitch. Here I was trying to gi= ve an even handed balanced overview of all the clients. For each client I w= as trying to empaphise a 'theme'. Bitcoin-Qt is stability. Armory is advanc= ed. Electrum is convenient. MultiBit is ease of use.=0A=0A_________________= _______________=0AFrom: Alan Reiner =0ATo: Amir Taaki = =0ACc: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net" =0ASent: Monday, April 30, 2012 7:2= 3 PM=0ASubject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] new bitcoin.org clients page=0A= =0A=0AHey, looks good! =A0I'm glad to see them sorted alphabetically :)=0A= =0AA couple comments: =A0I don't think the entries for "wallet security" an= d "backups" accurately describe Armory. =A0Wallet Security should say "Encr= ypt/Offline" or something to to that effect -- after all, offline wallets a= re the holy grail feature of the Armory. =A0And backups should say somethin= g like "One-time Printable" if it fits within the box. =A0=0A=0AOtherwise, = I really like the layout and design. =A0Although despite the fact I enjoy b= eing first on the list, I think Bitcoin-Qt should still go first. =A0It is = the "reference" client, and I think it's relevant that it is the "de-facto"= client for the majority of users, and the one with the most quality contro= l and stability.=0A=0A-Alan=0A=0A=0A=0AOn Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Ami= r Taaki wrote:=0A=0ACheck it :) https://github.com/bitc= oin/bitcoin.org/pull/34=0A>=0A>--------------------------------------------= ----------------------------------=0A>Live Security Virtual Conference=0A>E= xclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and=0A>threat = landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions=0A>will = include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware=0A>thr= eats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/=0A>________= _______________________________________=0A>Bitcoin-development mailing list= =0A>Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net=0A>https://lists.sourceforge.= net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development=0A>