From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <bitcoin-list@bluematt.me>) id 1SfZGI-0000AD-IV
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Fri, 15 Jun 2012 16:20:38 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of bluematt.me
	designates 173.246.101.161 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=173.246.101.161;
	envelope-from=bitcoin-list@bluematt.me; helo=mail.bluematt.me; 
Received: from vps.bluematt.me ([173.246.101.161] helo=mail.bluematt.me)
	by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	id 1SfZGF-0001Ap-2Q for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Fri, 15 Jun 2012 16:20:38 +0000
Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:9ff2:1:ee55:f9ff:fec6:e666] (unknown
	[IPv6:2001:470:9ff2:1:ee55:f9ff:fec6:e666])
	by mail.bluematt.me (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 23EA1398F;
	Fri, 15 Jun 2012 16:20:29 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <1339777227.31489.89.camel@bmthinkpad>
From: Matt Corallo <bitcoin-list@bluematt.me>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@exmulti.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 18:20:27 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CA+8xBpfHpMX5FUJz4HSYxOoeDEGZ0S4Ufz1pRYbwJLcPiVw_CA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+8xBpecVQcTTbPxUm_3_GWC99dEd4=-VFWb+QT6jUy4rg8U4w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANEZrP0kNZDByHpK2=UjP+ag0X1KmqHxnJdm=e_pWMitP4QvvA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+8xBpcwhQPQRe=stYb9xksLsTbiABKLS7PZnRtvPga6AmSg4Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANEZrP39RHfCDX-x4ARo+oPphLv-70RxuMh3+AJzsNPxzOd=bA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+8xBpfHpMX5FUJz4HSYxOoeDEGZ0S4Ufz1pRYbwJLcPiVw_CA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2-1 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	-0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
	domain
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
X-Headers-End: 1SfZGF-0001Ap-2Q
Cc: Bitcoin Development <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] New P2P commands for diagnostics,
 SPV clients
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 16:20:38 -0000

On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 11:32 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>  As for full nodes... I like the organic growth and random nature of
> the mempools.  On the fence, WRT full node mempool sync at startup.
> 
I dont particularly care either way, but I have a feeling miners will
really want that so that they can get fee-paying transactions right
away.

Matt