From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SvwXi-0006xh-Ps for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 20:26:18 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from nm16-vm3.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([98.138.91.146]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with smtp (Exim 4.76) id 1SvwXh-0008FC-NM for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 20:26:18 +0000 Received: from [98.138.90.54] by nm16.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Jul 2012 20:26:12 -0000 Received: from [98.138.89.244] by tm7.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Jul 2012 20:26:12 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1058.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Jul 2012 20:26:12 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 229862.48568.bm@omp1058.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 14949 invoked by uid 60001); 30 Jul 2012 20:26:12 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: CxmFH2YVM1m23um1PP5xgtpdiK.tgG0_39PI5el7z.W.937 LxuTqUoHx_QzM8FCcxQX8q35I6TFqDR.4VF9avwxKKSlF3v3Tjvx8HoSjmPo 6l4Lk.dReI95Oxzm5OAr_bodflKpAhtyYhu5sqn4BqveQYsmYZEthII4uljI SC181QxtCXaQFcGvebYnZwUBhh0FGZ9uQ61aElfwG5e6v7jZg6yfunu_2Mie hVGCOgRXZiToVaIcydYD8KsdN6kjtvtsBw_pYNruSWwv7VpyduasP89LExz6 z_orlZIlbORgQFG6RrZuE46ZWloMbkwA._PK_0awLPLFynGGwRGatlXP5KHj 5Z7CBbW54QtdaPFKAkGFw.LV0GQGha6y_tOpknwYAv20BMqLOf6g1R8gEX3Z u6o0pyWizq6JOZJKXj5oUObKlv7sEvsdOdfRHTSOeLXZIhq71O_eY8icFJAu xNZf1RY1lS2QR5xYTexg1i8tI5XYwcQ-- Received: from [187.57.207.48] by web121004.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:26:12 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.120.356233 Message-ID: <1343679972.9880.YahooMailNeo@web121004.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:26:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Amir Taaki To: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (zgenjix[at]yahoo.com) -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [98.138.91.146 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FSL_FREEMAIL_2 FSL_FREEMAIL_2 0.0 FSL_FREEMAIL_1 FSL_FREEMAIL_1 X-Headers-End: 1SvwXh-0008FC-NM Subject: [Bitcoin-development] BIP 22 - getmemorypool X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: Amir Taaki List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 20:26:18 -0000 Hi, luke-jr wants me to split this BIP into 3 separate BIPs because he says that other devs felt it was too unfocused and covered too many topics. However this discussion took place on IRC, and I never saw any of it to ascertain what happened (BIP 1 says drafts should be evaluated on the mailing list). I think a discussion of BIP 22 perhaps did happen on the mailing list, but I don't remember it. Sorry if that's the case. Anyway before granting the permission to allow this proposal to be pared down, and new BIPs granted for the non-core parts of this proposal, I want to know what people think. I'm not a miner myself, so I'm prescient of my lack of knowledge in the topic. https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/BIP_0022 Thanks