From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EB75727 for ; Sat, 11 Feb 2017 15:57:55 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from lvps83-169-4-30.dedicated.hosteurope.de (lvps83-169-4-30.dedicated.hosteurope.de [83.169.4.30]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AD0C224 for ; Sat, 11 Feb 2017 15:57:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21604 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2017 16:57:53 +0100 Received: from unknown (HELO hpdc7800) (10.0.0.1) by 10.0.0.2 with (AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 11 Feb 2017 16:57:50 +0100 Message-ID: <1486828666.21100.115.camel@stafverhaegen.be> From: Staf Verhaegen To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 16:57:46 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <201702030024.10232.luke@dashjr.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-kb6lcioZKYv5Bsja0Vns" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.11 (3.12.11-22.el7) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 16:49:58 +0000 Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Pre-BIP] Community Consensus Voting System X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 15:57:55 -0000 --=-kb6lcioZKYv5Bsja0Vns Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Chris Priest via bitcoin-dev schreef op vr 03-02-2017 om 16:57 [-0800]: > Personally I think once the blocksize arguments are solved, there will > be no more contentious changes for this voting system to deal with. > What other contentious issues have come up in the past 3 years or so > that wasn't blocksize/scaling related? Do other protocols like TCP/IP > and the HTTP protocol have developers arguing every day over issues no > one can agree on? Yes, DRM for example. Staf. --=-kb6lcioZKYv5Bsja0Vns Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iF4EABEIAAYFAlifNH4ACgkQWIjyN0LdGqzTFwEArSWEDCqONMulEDjMmCNtFcny 62PbQaAWTDAeAZHtn68A/3R4hB3x4D59UD4jU+jszp2iqZZA6maAk8gMADRSO0cR =L5f7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-kb6lcioZKYv5Bsja0Vns--