From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 874DA5AC for ; Sun, 2 Apr 2017 19:45:17 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from lvps83-169-4-30.dedicated.hosteurope.de (lvps83-169-4-30.dedicated.hosteurope.de [83.169.4.30]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB0B11B9 for ; Sun, 2 Apr 2017 19:45:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8159 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2017 21:45:15 +0200 Received: from unknown (HELO hpdc7800) (10.0.0.1) by 10.0.0.2 with (AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 2 Apr 2017 21:45:15 +0200 Message-ID: <1491162311.7267.9.camel@stafverhaegen.be> From: Staf Verhaegen To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2017 21:45:11 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <61B9AE0D-5A58-4A72-8834-8ED164ED627F@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-zC6bwyrUj5sRj6kDvd+5" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.11 (3.12.11-22.el7) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 02 Apr 2017 19:51:31 +0000 Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] High fees / centralization X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2017 19:45:17 -0000 --=-zC6bwyrUj5sRj6kDvd+5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jared Lee Richardson via bitcoin-dev schreef op do 30-03-2017 om 19:01 [-0700]: > That would be blockchain sharding. >=20 > Would be amazing if someone could figure out how to do it trustlessly. > So far I'm not convinced it is possible to resolve the conflicts > between the shards and commit transactions between shards. I'm thinking more of a system where different nodes can agree to do part of the transaction processing. In that way 20000 nodes could work like 5000 full nodes. greets, Staf. --=-zC6bwyrUj5sRj6kDvd+5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iF4EABEIAAYFAljhVMoACgkQWIjyN0LdGqyKrAD/fWevj+fOlptIV7mINLaRZvGd mGNQZeiwjbfPTpxGolsBAICYjEneNxA9pQkHZsyZMg96dNVrSKDbvFzly7BZaHwB =PbGA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-zC6bwyrUj5sRj6kDvd+5--