From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57C1A323 for ; Sun, 16 Aug 2015 09:51:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: delayed 00:05:34 by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from smtprelay03.ispgateway.de (smtprelay03.ispgateway.de [80.67.31.26]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2539B0 for ; Sun, 16 Aug 2015 09:51:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [89.13.152.131] (helo=anonymous) by smtprelay03.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1ZQuVD-00058A-Pg for bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org; Sun, 16 Aug 2015 11:45:19 +0200 From: xor To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Reply-To: xor@freenetproject.org Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2015 11:46:06 +0200 Message-ID: <1527744.9EQbJdl4Dy@1337h4x0r> Organization: Freenet Project User-Agent: KMail/4.13.3 (Linux/3.13.0-61-generic; KDE/4.13.3; x86_64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart14700057.oK8ouBZ3IW"; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Df-Sender: eG9yQGZyZWVtYWlsLmJvZ2VydC5kZQ== X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Humans constantly arguing about bsize proves that computers should decide X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2015 09:51:49 -0000 --nextPart14700057.oK8ouBZ3IW Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hey folks, so you've been stressed with arguing about what to do with the block size for months now :( Why not realize that the unfruitful permanent need for administrators to tweak a magical, god-given (= Satoshi-given) constant is a *strong* indicator for something which should be delegated to a self-adjusting system instead? new_max_blocksize = some_averaging_function(previous_block_sizes); end_of_flamewar(); continue_with_REAL_development(); Systems which do not require any human intervention are always more beautiful, and especially when trying to design a decentralized P2P network :) Greetings, xor, a developer working for the Freenet anonymous P2P network --nextPart14700057.oK8ouBZ3IW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABCAAGBQJV0FviAAoJEMtmZ+8tjWt5EHkP/3reSGUO745P/lYgvcOwWEHt w++uotL4xgl31ttE5XLMx8Wq5rxAS6IkALEGzfFAkejv/0nQo13nDwLgVwGOtry/ WpxP7g9dReSmoptR6GX5N3rZJdJTGZKqNtrl0uFy4mDD72pTQVtJbWu960WM103E x8A8bMryPkTT7BtM6I6gMl7RsLIMKP3kntUwXL83JkJ/hq5yB9drwvjFXjIhAx05 nvhFvC6EhkFvDi/zA9JGzBUcTNs21TC/+N5C4bqsq3jtzSV8lQvpjLFlIMIJEHO5 LYzQpFGzCZekjsYALreQx9tVgMCgshM3YFVVyB3YXoZ3s/LMwmT3Ogu2Tw7C39vK +t1oKxO7fVbOkX4nj/IqSLmARbeqAIuLqgJCY44WPebMHyEB0Jeyqjod0s69U/Tu HjrfyTOOKdBed2sP6hBvc+chwOHBnZOBC59Tk2uAsdtVPOsBZOBC1y//IHk+wuB2 YfWvmSnPNa20msaMXKyBt4+mvjhnjFLctFRucQp5yVCw2nMF66m1dX7/TfApnJ7W 6M+Ia9sNxp71/wUtl2/ll6clVldY84qjSVCPLLmE0gf9uCpdAz0PU64qwoVkIExR gZysDg0HBVVAZ0fYFug9MT0s2aQQMaeegM8D92i3ZFJS1AORe8KW7dglWCL+2v00 zpYEDW7UoOKlkzDcbg03 =tjj7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart14700057.oK8ouBZ3IW--