From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DF2BBA2 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 16:39:01 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mx-out01.mykolab.com (mx.kolabnow.com [95.128.36.1]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26E02224 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 16:39:00 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at kolabnow.com X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from mx04.mykolab.com (mx04.mykolab.com [10.20.7.102]) by mx-out01.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D775F65CC5 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 18:38:56 +0200 (CEST) From: Tom Zander To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 18:38:55 +0200 Message-ID: <1536368.e5g6sdTPab@strawberry> In-Reply-To: <4FDEA4E2-F96D-4A2B-BE6C-04808CFEC74B@jonasschnelli.ch> References: <2778650.T23JsbTI1Y@strawberry> <4FDEA4E2-F96D-4A2B-BE6C-04808CFEC74B@jonasschnelli.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 17:18:35 +0000 Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Proposal: Compact Client Side Filtering for Light Clients X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 16:39:01 -0000 On Monday, 19 June 2017 18:30:18 CEST Jonas Schnelli wrote: > I personally would ALWAYS [snip] I mentioned that it was a usability point for a reason, and your personal=20 behavior makes me want to quote one of the main UX guidelines;=20 =E2=80=9CYou are not your user=E2=80=9D http://uxmyths.com/post/715988395/myth-you-are-like-your-users older; http://52weeksofux.com/post/385981879/you-are-not-your-user I think we should defer to actual real numbers and user reseach, as has bee= n=20 quoted by Andreas. You disagreeing based on your own experience and behavio= r=20 is worse than useless. As the above links show. Don=E2=80=99t fall in that trap :) =2D-=20 Tom Zander Blog: https://zander.github.io Vlog: https://vimeo.com/channels/tomscryptochannel