From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <tomz@freedommail.ch>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6466B5F
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue, 14 Feb 2017 17:58:39 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mx-out02.mykolab.com (mx.kolabnow.com [95.128.36.1])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EED5814D
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue, 14 Feb 2017 17:58:38 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at kolabnow.com
X-Spam-Score: -2.9
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Received: from mx03.mykolab.com (mx03.mykolab.com [10.20.7.101])
	by mx-out02.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5FB261778
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue, 14 Feb 2017 18:58:35 +0100 (CET)
From: Tom Zander <tomz@freedommail.ch>
To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 19:01:03 +0100
Message-ID: <1850609.e9N5m2HcLf@strawberry>
In-Reply-To: <c949a1a2-ca6c-1fa8-6712-0846c5519f66@jonasschnelli.ch>
References: <c949a1a2-ca6c-1fa8-6712-0846c5519f66@jonasschnelli.ch>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 18:01:41 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP150/151 concerns and some comments
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 17:58:39 -0000

On Tuesday, 14 February 2017 17:10:15 CET Jonas Schnelli via bitcoin-dev=20
wrote:
> - If you use one of the todays available SPV clients, you will reveal
> your complete wallet content (=E2=80=9E~all your addresses") to every net=
work
> observer between you and the node you have connected to. This means, if
> you pay for a coffee (while being on the owners WIFI), the coffee owner
> and all the involved ISPs can correlate your wallet with your other
> internet behavior. Same is true for your cellphone provider if you use
> cellular.

What about allowing trusted users connecting on a different connection. Muc=
h=20
like the RPC one.
Make that one encrypted. Different usecase, different connection.

=2D-=20
Tom Zander
Blog: https://zander.github.io
Vlog: https://vimeo.com/channels/tomscryptochannel