From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A8CC982 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 05:05:36 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: delayed 00:08:11 by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from resqmta-ch2-12v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-12v.sys.comcast.net [69.252.207.44]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D2EAF4 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 05:05:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from resomta-ch2-15v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.111]) by resqmta-ch2-12v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id nGxQ1q0022Qkjl901GxQ15; Thu, 02 Jul 2015 04:57:24 +0000 Received: from crushinator.localnet ([IPv6:2601:186:c000:825e:e9f4:8901:87c7:24a0]) by resomta-ch2-15v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id nGxM1q00D4eLRLv01GxNzb; Thu, 02 Jul 2015 04:57:23 +0000 From: Matt Whitlock To: Mark Friedenbach Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 00:57:21 -0400 Message-ID: <1854821.ToCRAf8eXU@crushinator> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.9 (Linux/4.0.5-gentoo; KDE/4.14.9; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1435813044; bh=KylRoUyWJN5i79BvbPTKsxGM98vafZ3LroSGRWiyJeY=; h=Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=JGdOi+XTOBvBoUr19E/buDREEoukaZo95a21OwaeFOZpL3soN+vE5UgAGlYlR71Qn C9GFDzBxvSHWM2p1qBdWI+bUKjZznz37P6nd7zHjxmMcRECppBRXMoA6nvmTH+t1B7 Q1pX/rh7tlxRMPef5GkK8XafKTZ5aizOhsjNOrn+gwoNNTYLfUam9p9B+NJAT6tFbY G5X1Fl9LrovEkfhNSwyiDx5xFiaK3oWUCnurF5EfktkfBlCTl7LH6zlA/Pyed1JpGh fAdjA/4ImJcf+i/ODHAdoSLkl1dRwQ/LCeuXMP6cv2p9ts46w2hYWzsp+2ixJ44PWU ouILir2w1Qq8g== X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] REQ BIP # / Discuss - Sweep incoming unconfirmed transactions with a bounty. X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 05:05:36 -0000 PR#1647 only addresses miner policy, though, right? I believe the BIP is addressing the user-facing side of this functionality. CPFP mining policy does very little good if wallets don't offer any way for users to goose up incoming transactions. On Wednesday, 1 July 2015, at 9:52 pm, Mark Friedenbach wrote: > This is called child pays for parent and there is a three year old pull > request implementing it: > > https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/1647 > > The points regarding sweep transaction UI is out of scope for a BIP I'm > afraid. I suggest talking with wallet authors, and if agreement can be > found writing a pull request. > On Jul 1, 2015 9:44 PM, "Dan Bryant" wrote: > > > This is a process BIP request to add functionality to the Bitcoin-Core > > reference implementation. If accepted, this could also add > > flexibility into any future fee schedules. > > > > https://github.com/d4n13/bips/blob/master/bip-00nn.mediawiki