From: Jonas Schnelli <dev@jonasschnelli.ch>
To: "admin@bitaps.com" <admin@bitaps.com>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Block Batch Filters for Light Clients
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 17:44:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1C1A9686-C852-4513-A05C-64F518105516@jonasschnelli.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E9935F93-B5D2-48FD-96D2-88EF605ADA4B@bitaps.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1628 bytes --]
Hi Aleksey
> BIP 157 unlike BIP 37 not allow apply filters to mempool and check zero confirmation transactions.
> Light client that refused to use BIP 37 due to privacy leaks can process unconfirmed transactions only one way and this is loading the entire mempool transaction flow.
>
> https://github.com/bitaps-com/bips/blob/master/bip-mempool-transactions-filters.mediawiki <https://github.com/bitaps-com/bips/blob/master/bip-mempool-transactions-filters.mediawiki>
Instead of using a per tx filter, would it be possible to allow retrieving a complete compact filter of the whole mempool (similar to BIP35)? Maybe using a maximum size of the filter (ordered by feerate).
In general, I guess the concerns are DOS and fingerprinting.
Maybe DOS could be mitigated via a dynamic filter construction (append elements during the time between blocks, though unsure if possible).
The update-interval of a such filter could also be timebases rather than on every new tx in the mempool.
Unsure about fingerprinting defence measures.
I would expect the following process:
* peer generates mempool filter
* [timespan A (say 3 seconds)]
* light client connects to peer
* light client requests mempool-filter
* peers sends mempool filter
* light client processes filter for relevant txns
* eventually, light client sends getdata of relevant txns
a) after the initial retrieve...
* light client inspects all new txns (inv/getdata) received from peers from this point on (filterless unconfirmed tx detection)
Of if a) is to bandwidth expansive, request the mempool filter again after a timeout
/jonas
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2166 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-11 15:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <mailman.22.1569240010.14875.bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-24 13:36 ` [bitcoin-dev] Block Batch Filters for Light Clients admin
2019-09-28 17:21 ` admin
2019-10-11 15:44 ` Jonas Schnelli [this message]
2019-09-19 17:20 admin
2019-09-21 21:16 ` Tamas Blummer
2019-09-23 5:20 ` nopara73
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1C1A9686-C852-4513-A05C-64F518105516@jonasschnelli.ch \
--to=dev@jonasschnelli.ch \
--cc=admin@bitaps.com \
--cc=bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox