From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Qd4h9-0006NS-Qt for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 18:13:31 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from zinan.dashjr.org ([173.242.112.54]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1Qd4h4-0003XD-1t for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 18:13:31 +0000 Received: from ishibashi.localnet (fl-67-77-87-72.dhcp.embarqhsd.net [67.77.87.72]) (Authenticated sender: luke-jr) by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4E8AC5605AF for ; Sat, 2 Jul 2011 18:13:18 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke-Jr" To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2011 14:12:18 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.39-gentoo; KDE/4.6.2; x86_64; ; ) References: <65026C81-A96E-490A-90D2-794A10C2A680@jrbobdobbs.org> In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: CE5A D56A 36CC 69FA E7D2 3558 665F C11D D53E 9583 X-PGP-Key-ID: 665FC11DD53E9583 X-PGP-Keyserver: x-hkp://subkeys.pgp.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201107021412.20483.luke@dashjr.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Headers-End: 1Qd4h4-0003XD-1t Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Reconsider build system change? X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2011 18:13:31 -0000 On Saturday, July 02, 2011 2:03:49 PM John Smith wrote: > As I said in my opening post, there *is* a cmake build system implemented > for bitcoin. puddinpop's stuff is all ancient/obsolete. If you want people to consider it, you should probably make a new branch.