From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1QiQVE-0002Nq-OB for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 17 Jul 2011 12:31:20 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from zinan.dashjr.org ([173.242.112.54]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1QiQV6-0000bm-2d for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 17 Jul 2011 12:31:20 +0000 Received: from ishibashi.localnet (fl-67-77-87-241.dhcp.embarqhsd.net [67.77.87.241]) (Authenticated sender: luke-jr) by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 682A2560569; Sun, 17 Jul 2011 12:31:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke-Jr" To: John Smith Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 08:30:50 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.39-gentoo; KDE/4.6.4; x86_64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: CE5A D56A 36CC 69FA E7D2 3558 665F C11D D53E 9583 X-PGP-Key-ID: 665FC11DD53E9583 X-PGP-Keyserver: x-hkp://subkeys.pgp.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201107170830.53053.luke@dashjr.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.1 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.6 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-Headers-End: 1QiQV6-0000bm-2d Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] The forums... X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 12:31:20 -0000 On Sunday, July 17, 2011 6:59:58 AM John Smith wrote: > > At the risk of making myself very unpopular, perhaps it's the > > development project that should move to a new URL? > > So you'd want to rename the project? > > I'm not sure that'd be a good idea. For better or worse, even though most > people don't get it because they think it's about mining or investments, > the 'bitcoin' name has become pretty well-known. The "Satoshi Client" doesn't really have a formal name yet. Don't confuse an implementation with the network itself.