public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Luke-Jr" <luke@dashjr.org>
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: kjj <kjj@jerviss.org>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Difficulty adjustment / time issues
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 19:01:54 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201109141901.57286.luke@dashjr.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAS2fgQOuNKWD09arSzqKxYFRv95q4xyq0Wz4ZkeKdKSWJ-=kA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wednesday, September 14, 2011 4:09:00 PM Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> Though I generally agree with Luke that we should just fix the root
> cause even though it forks the chain.

I don't support this, unless all other chain-forking-needed changes are made 
at the same time. I do point out that changing the time rules *does not help*.

> Not for his reasons (I don't give a crap about the burden on _one_ pool
> operator— the rest cope with bitcoind scaling fine without excessive
> dependance on ntime rolling),

The rest don't generate rewards immediately as the same block being mined. 
They either eat the loss of invalid blocks, or wait for 100+ confirmations 
before paying. Also, restricting the time rules basically breaks miners 
without rollntime support (such as Phoenix).



  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-09-14 23:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-13 15:06 [Bitcoin-development] Difficulty adjustment / time issues Gavin Andresen
2011-09-13 15:15 ` Vladimir Marchenko
2011-09-13 15:54 ` John Smith
2011-09-13 16:24 ` kjj
2011-09-14 14:45   ` Gavin Andresen
2011-09-14 15:43     ` Luke-Jr
2011-09-14 16:06       ` Christian Decker
2011-09-14 19:52     ` Aidan Thornton
2011-09-14 20:09       ` Gregory Maxwell
2011-09-14 20:28         ` Gavin Andresen
2011-09-14 21:36           ` Alex Waters
2011-09-14 21:51             ` Gregory Maxwell
2011-09-14 22:07               ` theymos
2011-09-14 23:01         ` Luke-Jr [this message]
2011-09-13 16:48 ` Luke-Jr
2011-09-14 21:45 ` theymos
2011-11-07 15:02 ` Pieter Wuille
2011-11-07 15:27   ` Luke-Jr
2011-11-07 15:43     ` Pieter Wuille

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201109141901.57286.luke@dashjr.org \
    --to=luke@dashjr.org \
    --cc=bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=kjj@jerviss.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox