* [Bitcoin-development] Miscommitted version
@ 2011-09-26 19:18 Luke-Jr
2011-09-28 3:44 ` Jeff Garzik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Luke-Jr @ 2011-09-26 19:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bitcoin-development, Gavin Andresen
* 6b8a5ab Bump version to 0.4.1
This should be some pre-0.5.0, not 0.4.1 which will be the stable team's first
release...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bitcoin-development] Miscommitted version
2011-09-26 19:18 [Bitcoin-development] Miscommitted version Luke-Jr
@ 2011-09-28 3:44 ` Jeff Garzik
2011-09-28 3:53 ` Luke-Jr
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2011-09-28 3:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Luke-Jr; +Cc: bitcoin-development
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Luke-Jr <luke@dashjr.org> wrote:
> * 6b8a5ab Bump version to 0.4.1
>
> This should be some pre-0.5.0, not 0.4.1 which will be the stable team's first
> release...
No. Technically speaking this most recent release was 0.4.0. That is
what is serialized in the build, and what is tagged.
Any stable version based off the most recent release would be 0.4.0.1.
And of course you're following the "upstream must have merged this fix
first" rule, right?
--
Jeff Garzik
exMULTI, Inc.
jgarzik@exmulti.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bitcoin-development] Miscommitted version
2011-09-28 3:44 ` Jeff Garzik
@ 2011-09-28 3:53 ` Luke-Jr
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Luke-Jr @ 2011-09-28 3:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Garzik; +Cc: bitcoin-development
On Tuesday, September 27, 2011 11:44:43 PM Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Luke-Jr <luke@dashjr.org> wrote:
> > * 6b8a5ab Bump version to 0.4.1
> >
> > This should be some pre-0.5.0, not 0.4.1 which will be the stable team's
> > first release...
>
> No. Technically speaking this most recent release was 0.4.0. That is
> what is serialized in the build, and what is tagged.
I'm aware of that.
> Any stable version based off the most recent release would be 0.4.0.1.
Ok. That's not usually how versions work, though. Gavin also recently stated
that the next version after 0.4.0 was to be 0.5, which is why the commit was a
surprise. I'm just trying to clarify what version number to use for stable,
and getting apparently mixed answers.
> And of course you're following the "upstream must have merged this fix
> first" rule, right?
Yep.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-09-28 3:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-09-26 19:18 [Bitcoin-development] Miscommitted version Luke-Jr
2011-09-28 3:44 ` Jeff Garzik
2011-09-28 3:53 ` Luke-Jr
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox