public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Luke-Jr" <luke@dashjr.org>
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Lock protocol version numbers
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2011 12:29:15 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201111051229.16790.luke@dashjr.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALxbBHWYdt_LRQE5K=36fXNNSqyGVSyYwxi2-p8mxQaei5LCZg@mail.gmail.com>

On Saturday, November 05, 2011 12:17:58 PM Christian Decker wrote:
> Sorry for shooting this approach down, but I'm against it. User-agent
> strings are an extremely bad idea as it would lead developers to start
> making communication choices depending on the client type.

This can be necessary in some cases. What happens when some popular client is 
found with a subtle bug, and cannot otherwise be differentiated from other 
similar-functionality clients? I have found User-Agent very valuable when 
dealing with the wide variety of miner bugs when I have enabled new 
functionality/behaviour on Eligius.



  reply	other threads:[~2011-11-05 16:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-02 21:23 [Bitcoin-development] Lock protocol version numbers Amir Taaki
2011-11-02 21:32 ` Christian Decker
     [not found] ` <CABsx9T0zUCu2RFC0Nc4URMtu060wyHMaebEM87in=NSiNbp=rw@mail.gmail.com>
2011-11-02 22:33   ` Amir Taaki
2011-11-02 22:42     ` Christian Decker
2011-11-02 22:58       ` Amir Taaki
2011-11-02 22:46     ` Luke-Jr
2011-11-02 22:55       ` Amir Taaki
2011-11-02 23:07         ` Luke-Jr
2011-11-02 23:22           ` Christian Decker
2011-11-03  4:46             ` Jeff Garzik
2011-11-05 14:32 ` Mike Hearn
2011-11-05 14:45   ` Christian Decker
     [not found]     ` <1320507570.40074.YahooMailNeo@web121017.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
2011-11-05 15:39       ` Amir Taaki
2011-11-05 16:17         ` Christian Decker
2011-11-05 16:29           ` Luke-Jr [this message]
2011-11-05 16:40             ` Amir Taaki
2011-11-05 17:30               ` Jordan Mack

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201111051229.16790.luke@dashjr.org \
    --to=luke@dashjr.org \
    --cc=bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox