From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RXCxY-0007Iv-W3 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 04 Dec 2011 14:22:28 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from zinan.dashjr.org ([173.242.112.54]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1RXCxT-0005Qc-L1 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 04 Dec 2011 14:22:28 +0000 Received: from ishibashi.localnet (fl-184-4-160-40.dhcp.embarqhsd.net [184.4.160.40]) (Authenticated sender: luke-jr) by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 02650204298; Sun, 4 Dec 2011 14:22:18 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke-Jr" To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 09:22:11 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.1.0-gentoo; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: CE5A D56A 36CC 69FA E7D2 3558 665F C11D D53E 9583 X-PGP-Key-ID: 665FC11DD53E9583 X-PGP-Keyserver: x-hkp://subkeys.pgp.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201112040922.13744.luke@dashjr.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.2 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Headers-End: 1RXCxT-0005Qc-L1 Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Closing issues on github X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 14:22:29 -0000 On Sunday, December 04, 2011 5:24:08 AM John Smith wrote: > I've also closed some issues that deal purely with Wx UI issues like this > one: > > https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/425 > > I think my statement is valid, that we no longer support the old UI? Or > maybe some people want to take up maintenance of the old UI? I think it would be ideal if someone wanted to take up wxBitcoin. Maybe after backporting to wx 2.8... That being said, I have no interest, as I hate wx, and prefer Qt in general ;) > I don't think that has very high priority, and should probably not be in the > main project. Please be careful to avoid the centralization mindset. There is no "main project"; there is bitcoind, wxBitcoin, Bitcoin-Qt, MultiBit, and many other non-functional clients, which should be given equal footing (before considering their differences). There shouldn't be given any special treatment to bitcoind and Bitcoin-Qt just because "Gavin et al" happen to maintain it. > Some of the older issues are absolutely still relevant, but 150+ open > issues is not something to be proud of, and I wonder how other open source > projects deal with this without too much stepping on people's toes :-) KDE literally just closed a bug of mine that I reported in 2002, because the component with the bug hasn't been part of KDE since 2008.