From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RaFVG-0001Um-UK for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 23:41:50 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from zinan.dashjr.org ([173.242.112.54]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1RaFVG-0007fz-3h for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 23:41:50 +0000 Received: from ishibashi.localnet (fl-184-4-160-40.dhcp.embarqhsd.net [184.4.160.40]) (Authenticated sender: luke-jr) by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 70DED56000E; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 23:41:44 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke-Jr" To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 18:41:38 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.1.4-gentoo; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <1323731781.42953.YahooMailClassic@web120920.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: CE5A D56A 36CC 69FA E7D2 3558 665F C11D D53E 9583 X-PGP-Key-ID: 665FC11DD53E9583 X-PGP-Keyserver: x-hkp://subkeys.pgp.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <201112121841.39864.luke@dashjr.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -2.3 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.3 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-Headers-End: 1RaFVG-0007fz-3h Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] [BIP 15] Aliases X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 23:41:51 -0000 On Monday, December 12, 2011 6:37:56 PM Jorge Tim=F3n wrote: > Would it be too strange to use namecoin? This has the same problem as FirstBits, except .bit domains are dirt cheap,= =20 whereas vanitygen at least slows down grabbing all the common words...