From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RgJRQ-0003DX-G4 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 17:06:56 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from zinan.dashjr.org ([173.242.112.54]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1RgJRP-0001lp-Nk for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 17:06:56 +0000 Received: from ishibashi.localnet (fl-184-4-160-40.dhcp.embarqhsd.net [184.4.160.40]) (Authenticated sender: luke-jr) by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3F709560502; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 17:06:50 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke-Jr" To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 12:06:42 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.1.5-gentoo; KDE/4.7.3; x86_64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: CE5A D56A 36CC 69FA E7D2 3558 665F C11D D53E 9583 X-PGP-Key-ID: 665FC11DD53E9583 X-PGP-Keyserver: x-hkp://subkeys.pgp.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201112291206.43476.luke@dashjr.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.3 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-Headers-End: 1RgJRP-0001lp-Nk Cc: pool@deepbit.net, webmaster@btcguild.com Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Alternative to OP_EVAL X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 17:06:56 -0000 On Thursday, December 29, 2011 12:01:20 PM roconnor@theorem.ca wrote: > This is not adequate: OP_SHA256 OP_EVAL runs random code that is > more than 5 bytes. So what? Why shouldn't I be able to run random code? I could always put that random code in the script verbatim, after all.