From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <luke@dashjr.org>) id 1RrwP2-0001Xz-GK
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:56:32 +0000
X-ACL-Warn: 
Received: from zinan.dashjr.org ([173.242.112.54])
	by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	id 1RrwP1-0007fs-Qi for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:56:32 +0000
Received: from ishibashi.localnet (fl-184-4-164-217.dhcp.embarqhsd.net
	[184.4.164.217]) (Authenticated sender: luke-jr)
	by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BD1DE560718;
	Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:56:23 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Luke-Jr" <luke@dashjr.org>
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:56:14 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.1.5-gentoo; KDE/4.7.4; x86_64; ; )
References: <CAKm8k+1VFYSt7115KKGy5C7orFoU-N=8vfkQ_sc8onfQq96_Ww@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKm8k+1VFYSt7115KKGy5C7orFoU-N=8vfkQ_sc8onfQq96_Ww@mail.gmail.com>
X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: CE5A D56A 36CC 69FA E7D2 3558 665F C11D D53E 9583
X-PGP-Key-ID: 665FC11DD53E9583
X-PGP-Keyserver: x-hkp://subkeys.pgp.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201201301356.16032.luke@dashjr.org>
X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
	domain -0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Headers-End: 1RrwP1-0007fs-Qi
Cc: Gary Rowe <g.rowe@froot.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP 21 (modification BIP 20)
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:56:32 -0000

On Monday, January 30, 2012 1:50:03 PM Gary Rowe wrote:
> Speaking on behalf of the MultiBit team (Jim's currently on holiday), we
> will not be supporting Tonal Bitcoins anytime soon. Therefore we back the
> BIP 21 proposal.

It is not correct to imply that BIP 20 requires Tonal Bitcoin support.
In fact, the exact opposite is true; it states that even if one unit (eg, TBC) 
would be a more rational way to display a specified amount, clients should 
still interpret it in the way that is deemed to be most intuitive to the user 
(eg, BTC).