From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RrvdZ-0002wT-Kc for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:07:29 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmx.de designates 213.165.64.23 as permitted sender) client-ip=213.165.64.23; envelope-from=thomasV1@gmx.de; helo=mailout-de.gmx.net; Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with smtp (Exim 4.76) id 1RrvdU-0005Vp-3M for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:07:29 +0000 Received: (qmail 18615 invoked by uid 0); 30 Jan 2012 18:07:18 -0000 Received: from 152.81.11.206 by www005.gmx.net with HTTP; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:07:16 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:07:16 +0100 From: thomasV1@gmx.de Message-ID: <20120130180716.261910@gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Authenticated: #19670841 X-Flags: 0001 X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 6100 (Global Message Exchange) X-Priority: 3 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19P+FF6Q59PvDgYEvWF6ezLmcjLNynk8l97XYx+Ib rTkgK0rR/Ot1FgJTxuSo33jhIgVeheoFBq6A== Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-GMX-UID: A7lUbysHeSEqUFhER3UhvfN+IGRvbwB9 X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [213.165.64.23 listed in list.dnswl.org] -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (thomasv1[at]gmx.de) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.2 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in digit (thomasv1[at]gmx.de) 0.0 FAKE_REPLY_C FAKE_REPLY_C X-Headers-End: 1RrvdU-0005Vp-3M Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP 21 (modification BIP 20) X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:07:29 -0000 I too support BIP21 over BIP20. However, I do not understand the "Sending money via private key" feature; in which situation would such a URI be useful? Also, I posted a proposal in the forum, to extend the URI syntax with signatures. The goal would be to provide a proof of identity of the recipient; genjix told me that it would be more appropriate to post that here. My proposal is described here: http://ecdsa.org/bitcoin_URIs.html My original forum post is here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=58534.msg689190#msg689190 -- Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de