From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RungR-0005sA-O1 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:14:19 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from zinan.dashjr.org ([173.242.112.54]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1RungL-0004db-TP for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:14:19 +0000 Received: from ishibashi.localnet (fl-184-4-164-217.dhcp.embarqhsd.net [184.4.164.217]) (Authenticated sender: luke-jr) by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 407105607EF; Tue, 7 Feb 2012 16:14:08 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke-Jr" To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 11:14:00 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.2-gentoo; KDE/4.7.4; x86_64; ; ) References: <201202061054.26448.luke@dashjr.org> <201202071004.37615.luke@dashjr.org> In-Reply-To: <201202071004.37615.luke@dashjr.org> X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: CE5A D56A 36CC 69FA E7D2 3558 665F C11D D53E 9583 X-PGP-Key-ID: 665FC11DD53E9583 X-PGP-Keyserver: x-hkp://subkeys.pgp.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201202071114.01444.luke@dashjr.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Headers-End: 1RungL-0004db-TP Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Version 0.6 release candidate 1 plan X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:14:19 -0000 On Tuesday, February 07, 2012 10:04:36 AM Luke-Jr wrote: > On Monday, February 06, 2012 10:54:25 AM Luke-Jr wrote: > > > 769 : Make transactions with extra data in scriptSig non-standard > > > > If this affects relaying, it will significantly harm the ability to > > replace the current spammy "green address" scheme with a sensible extra > > signature system. On the miner end, it could significantly harm adoption > > of such a system. gmaxwell explained to me why this is no longer needed on IRC. I withdraw my objection.