From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SqvMh-00039W-54 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 00:10:11 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from zinan.dashjr.org ([173.242.112.54]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1SqvMe-0007YR-1h for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 00:10:11 +0000 Received: from ishibashi.localnet (unknown [97.96.85.141]) (Authenticated sender: luke-jr) by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CE8F1560530; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 00:10:02 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke-Jr" To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 00:09:48 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.4.4-gentoo-nestfix; KDE/4.8.3; x86_64; ; ) References: <1342374776.83467.YahooMailNeo@web121004.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: E463 A93F 5F31 17EE DE6C 7316 BD02 9424 21F4 889F X-PGP-Key-ID: BD02942421F4889F X-PGP-Keyserver: hkp://pgp.mit.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201207170009.51016.luke@dashjr.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Headers-End: 1SqvMe-0007YR-1h Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] bitcoin.org - remove hackathon X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 00:10:11 -0000 On Monday, July 16, 2012 11:47:02 PM Jeff Garzik wrote: > Vladimir does raise a fair point, though. Hackathon seems appropriate > for bitcoin.org as it is focused on dev-related activities. (full > disclosure: speaking at bitcoin2012.com) The conference might or > might not be. The conference does seem community focused, so I don't > object to it being on bitcoin.org... But if consensus prefers > otherwise, that's OK too. IMO, bitcoin.org is more community-focussed anyway. How often do devs use the site, compared to GitHub etc? Someone else made a pullreq for Bitcoin Magazine; I suggest(ed) that for-profit organizations should be asked to pitch in some way or another. Who should organize that, I don't know. If Bitcoin Consultancy/Amir is behind the conference, I suggest their/his development contributions should be sufficient in that respect. > PS. This seems like material for pull requests, which is preferred > over mailing list email + git push. When working on the satoshi > client, we all ACK each other's pull req for anything beyond the > trivial. I concur, this should be discussed in a pullreq.