public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Luke-Jr" <luke@dashjr.org>
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Scalability issues
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 06:03:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201207270604.01966.luke@dashjr.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD2Ti29LR+9=uO+LnrcsTYGSFW9S1FWuCLtoU-KwKkNmiVrnGQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Friday, July 27, 2012 5:59:20 AM grarpamp wrote:
> > I now have an 1.8 ghz p3 celeron (128k cache) which should be
> > substantially slower than your machine, running vintage 2.6.20 linux.
> > Unfortunately I forgot to turn on timestamp logging so I don't know
> > how long it took to sync the chain, but it was less than two days as
> > that was the span between when I checked on it. It's staying current
> 
> Well, are you running bitcoin on, say, an FS with sha256 integrity
> trees for all bits and AES-128-XTS/CBC disk encryption?

Trying to run state-of-the-art encryption on EVERYTHING on an ancient computer 
is fairly ill-advised. I encourage you to continue with the plan to go 
shopping.

> Someone suggested I investigate turning off the above features.
> Since I'd find their loss undesirable [1], and there's not much to be
> tuned there anyways, I've given up and am investigating what more
> GHz and cores will do.
> 
> [1] Keeping data both intact and private is a good thing. Does your
> checkbook deserve any less?

Sounds reasonable...
but why do you also need to encrypt 2+ GB of public record?

Luke



  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-27  6:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-22 22:37 [Bitcoin-development] Scalability issues grarpamp
2012-07-23  7:23 ` Raphael NICOLLE
2012-07-23  7:35 ` Gregory Maxwell
2012-07-23  9:00   ` Michael Grønager
2012-07-23 15:11     ` grarpamp
     [not found]       ` <CAAS2fgREzk_dU0ie+YvDdRwKcTk6tk_i=a2Bb74w9uF=EwYhGA@mail.gmail.com>
2012-07-23 22:33         ` grarpamp
2012-07-27  4:20           ` grarpamp
2012-07-27  4:59             ` Gregory Maxwell
2012-07-27  5:59               ` grarpamp
2012-07-27  6:03                 ` Luke-Jr [this message]
2012-07-27  6:28                   ` grarpamp
2012-07-27  6:56                 ` Gregory Maxwell
2012-07-27 19:37                   ` grarpamp
2012-07-27  8:53                 ` Andreas Petersson
     [not found]             ` <CAPg+sBjpqqxL_GxYc+8Ry7DcXMkouO9bYi5VqOyEjj_5s0x06Q@mail.gmail.com>
2012-07-27  9:59               ` Pieter Wuille
2012-07-27 19:26               ` grarpamp
2012-07-23 15:54     ` steve
2012-07-24  8:25       ` Michael Grønager
2012-07-24  9:18         ` Mike Hearn
2012-07-24 19:56         ` steve
2012-07-25  9:45           ` Michael Grønager
2012-07-25 14:24             ` steve
2012-07-23 22:50 ` Aidan Thornton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201207270604.01966.luke@dashjr.org \
    --to=luke@dashjr.org \
    --cc=bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox