From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UFoAS-0003eK-1h for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 16:04:40 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of petertodd.org designates 62.13.149.75 as permitted sender) client-ip=62.13.149.75; envelope-from=pete@petertodd.org; helo=outmail149075.authsmtp.net; Received: from outmail149075.authsmtp.net ([62.13.149.75]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1UFoAQ-00075A-Oo for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 16:04:40 +0000 Received: from mail-c235.authsmtp.com (mail-c235.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.235]) by punt14.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id r2DG4T85005309; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 16:04:29 GMT Received: from savin (76-10-178-109.dsl.teksavvy.com [76.10.178.109]) (authenticated bits=128) by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id r2DG4MQk038210 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 13 Mar 2013 16:04:24 GMT Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 12:04:21 -0400 From: Peter Todd To: Luke-Jr Message-ID: <20130313160421.GA23566@savin> References: <201303131256.30144.luke@dashjr.org> <20130313150501.GA14067@savin> <201303131526.16406.luke@dashjr.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201303131526.16406.luke@dashjr.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Server-Quench: ad1b5d8b-8bf7-11e2-b5c5-002590a15da7 X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at: http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR aQdMdwEUFVQGAgsB AmUbWlJeUFl7W2Y7 bAxPbAVDY01GQQRq WVdMSlVNFUsqA2h2 AmN/CRlxfwdHeDBx ZURgWj4KCEUocBJ1 EFNcRzsBeGZhPWIC AkULch5UcAFPdx8U a1UrBXRDAzANdhES HhM4ODE3eDlSNilR RRkIIFQOdA5TWG56 HlgDETgmBiUA X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1023:706 X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255) X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 76.10.178.109/587 X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own anti-virus system. X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Headers-End: 1UFoAQ-00075A-Oo Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] 0.8.1 ideas X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 16:04:40 -0000 --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 03:26:14PM +0000, Luke-Jr wrote: > On Wednesday, March 13, 2013 3:18:36 PM Gregory Maxwell wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Peter Todd wrote: > > > If we're going to consider doing this, at minimum we need to also > >=20 > > I beg people to not derail discussion about fixing things with > > discussion of other controversial changes. >=20 > I figured 2 MB in 2-3 years was fairly uncontroversial. > If not, let's scrap that idea for now. The very statement that we're willing to increase the blocksize as our solution to increased transaction volume rather go down the path of off-chain transactions is incredibly controversial. Fuck it, I'll make this public: I've had at least one person who went to the trouble of finding my personal phone number just so they could leave a few text messages saying I was going to do serious harm to Bitcoin. At the same time I've also had a few people asking questions along the line of had started and/or was considering starting a formal group opposing the blocksize increase. I even got a significant anonymous donation a few weeks ago. (rather fittingly this was done by emailing me an easywallet URL from a throwaway account) It's not just forum trolls who care about the issue, even if they make the most noise about it. --=20 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlFAo4UACgkQpEFN739thowm0ACfR1If0f8iN4HMbJL6BjBKqeYb i0IAoIRFF+WbGM5gyISleBuGUVIYHAev =kGAg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s--