From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <luke@dashjr.org>) id 1UFq6J-0001jZ-QW
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Wed, 13 Mar 2013 18:08:31 +0000
X-ACL-Warn: 
Received: from zinan.dashjr.org ([173.242.112.54])
	by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	id 1UFq6F-0003NJ-Ls for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Wed, 13 Mar 2013 18:08:31 +0000
Received: from ishibashi.localnet (unknown [173.170.142.26])
	(Authenticated sender: luke-jr)
	by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0F7F227A296A
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Wed, 13 Mar 2013 18:08:22 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Luke-Jr" <luke@dashjr.org>
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 18:08:17 +0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.7.3-gentoo; KDE/4.9.5; x86_64; ; )
References: <CABsx9T0xOpNpFG4bo7wjcMV8a_xtw_jrRx_fiSutX08yfP8P7Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<20130313174838.GA22621@savin>
	<2FCCE0F7-66B0-4EBE-8448-C5F0F92A75FF@ceptacle.com>
In-Reply-To: <2FCCE0F7-66B0-4EBE-8448-C5F0F92A75FF@ceptacle.com>
X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: E463 A93F 5F31 17EE DE6C 7316 BD02 9424 21F4 889F
X-PGP-Key-ID: BD02942421F4889F
X-PGP-Keyserver: hkp://pgp.mit.edu
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201303131808.18597.luke@dashjr.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-2.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
	domain
X-Headers-End: 1UFq6F-0003NJ-Ls
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Blocksize and off-chain transactions
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 18:08:32 -0000

On Wednesday, March 13, 2013 6:01:02 PM Michael Gronager wrote:
> Please note that it was not 0.8 that had issues, but 0.7(and downwards).

While 0.7 and earlier do have issues, they also define the Bitcoin protocol. 
0.8's failure to comply with the protocol is an issue.