From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Luke-Jr <luke@dashjr.org>
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] RFC: extend signmessage/verifymessage to P2SH multisig
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 02:29:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130414062939.GB3310@savin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201304140526.38940.luke@dashjr.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 967 bytes --]
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 05:26:37AM +0000, Luke-Jr wrote:
> On Sunday, April 14, 2013 5:09:58 AM Peter Todd wrote:
> > Currently signmessage/verifymessage only supports messages signed by a
> > single key. We should extend that to messages signed by n-of-m keys, or
> > from the users point of view, P2SH multisig addresses.
>
> I think it would be wise to figure out HD wallet changes before trying to
> extend message signing. For privacy/safety, it would be a good idea to avoid
> signing with the same private key twice under any circumstances, so it might
> make sense to create a new address format the represent a chain of keys
> instead of one key or combination of keys.
Sure, which is why I have the header byte so that when we do come up
with a chain of keys thing, that in turn can get it's own magic number
allocated.
FWIW I have an application now where a multisig signmessage would be
useful.
--
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-14 6:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-14 5:09 [Bitcoin-development] RFC: extend signmessage/verifymessage to P2SH multisig Peter Todd
2013-04-14 5:21 ` Alan Reiner
2013-04-14 6:25 ` Peter Todd
2013-04-14 18:24 ` Alan Reiner
2013-04-14 5:26 ` Luke-Jr
2013-04-14 6:29 ` Peter Todd [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130414062939.GB3310@savin \
--to=pete@petertodd.org \
--cc=bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=luke@dashjr.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox