From: Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>
To: Adam Back <adam@cypherspace.org>
Cc: Bitcoin-Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] minor bitcoin-qt gripes moving BTC off specific key
Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 15:19:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130507131948.GA4231@vps7135.xlshosting.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130507121641.GA11770@netbook.cypherspace.org>
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 02:16:41PM +0200, Adam Back wrote:
> Hi
>
> Three minor security/other issues:
>
> 1. please a way to unlock the wallet without displaying wallet password in
> console screen (console unlock wallet, to import priv key); or
I think the general solution here is providing a feature-reach Python RPC client,
which can do things like remember passwords, command history/tab completion,
perhaps even batch lookups of compound commands (getblock $(getblockhash X, for
example, ...). The naive RPC client built into bitcoind is not a good fit for
many features, as they can much more efficiently be developed outside of the
core binary,
> 2. a button to import a private key (and option to transfer it to another
> key - if you are not the sole controller the private key)
I'm quite opposed to any per-key fiddling in the GUI. This will inevitably lead
to (even more) people misunderstanding how wallets work and shooting themself in
the foot. I don't mind an expert mode ("coin control") that enables such features,
but in general, we should for entire-wallet export and import rather than
individual keys.
Import & sweep an address is something else, that sounds safe to.
> 3. a UX way to transfer BTC off a specific adress (eg choose from
> address), rather than having to spend the entire wallet onto a new
> address, just to get BTC off a specific address. Doing it that way has
> problems: creates more network traffic/bigger packets, higher fees (if
> any transactions are young/low confirmation), and generally damages
> privacy as all your funds end up linked.
This belongs in coin control, IMHO.
--
Pieter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-07 13:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-07 12:16 [Bitcoin-development] minor bitcoin-qt gripes moving BTC off specific key Adam Back
2013-05-07 12:28 ` Gavin Andresen
2013-05-07 13:14 ` Wladimir
2013-05-07 13:19 ` Pieter Wuille [this message]
2013-05-07 16:06 ` Adam Back
2013-05-07 16:44 ` Craig B Agricola
2013-05-10 15:27 ` Jesus Cea
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130507131948.GA4231@vps7135.xlshosting.net \
--to=pieter.wuille@gmail.com \
--cc=adam@cypherspace.org \
--cc=bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox