From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UsGyo-0003a5-TK for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 18:31:38 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from [162.213.26.82] (helo=zinan.dashjr.org) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1UsGyn-0005WB-7m for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 18:31:38 +0000 Received: from ishibashi.localnet (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:5:265:222:4dff:fe50:4c49]) (Authenticated sender: luke-jr) by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 88F9827A2965; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 18:04:54 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke-Jr" To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 18:04:49 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.7.8-gentoo; KDE/4.10.3; x86_64; ; ) References: <1372353053.10405.140661249237317.77984E1F@webmail.messagingengine.com> In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: E463 A93F 5F31 17EE DE6C 7316 BD02 9424 21F4 889F X-PGP-Key-ID: BD02942421F4889F X-PGP-Keyserver: hkp://pgp.mit.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201306271804.51009.luke@dashjr.org> X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. 1.0 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS X-Headers-End: 1UsGyn-0005WB-7m Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: MultiBit as default desktop client on bitcoin.org X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 18:31:39 -0000 On Thursday, June 27, 2013 5:30:21 PM Jeff Garzik wrote: > * Very real possibility of an overall net reduction of full nodes on P2P > network Even a reduction of *nodes at all*, as I've never seen a listening bitcoinj or MultiBit node. :/ Jim, will MultiBit be adding p2p listening support? > I'm sure others can come up with a few more. Possibly against: Does MultiBit still promote Bitcoin misunderstandings with misinformation like "from" addresses? (my apologies if I am remembering a different client)