From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UzqyX-0000uM-MF for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 16:22:42 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of petertodd.org designates 62.13.149.95 as permitted sender) client-ip=62.13.149.95; envelope-from=pete@petertodd.org; helo=outmail149095.authsmtp.com; Received: from outmail149095.authsmtp.com ([62.13.149.95]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1UzqyV-0003Mc-Rr for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 16:22:41 +0000 Received: from mail-c226.authsmtp.com (mail-c226.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.226]) by punt7.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/Kp) with ESMTP id r6IGMW2j087089; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 17:22:32 +0100 (BST) Received: from petertodd.org (petertodd.org [174.129.28.249]) (authenticated bits=128) by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id r6IGMQLc031347 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 18 Jul 2013 17:22:29 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 12:22:26 -0400 From: Peter Todd To: Wendell Message-ID: <20130718162226.GB29323@petertodd.org> References: <2BDA0943-22BB-4405-9AF0-86FB41FD04A6@include7.ch> <2F20A509-13A9-4C84-86D7-A15C21BACD53@include7.ch> <2A1C412D-414E-4C41-8E20-F0D21F801328@grabhive.com> <8EE501AA-1601-4C28-A32E-80F17D219D3A@grabhive.com> <20130717105853.GA10083@savin> <3DB67FAF-E113-47FE-9043-C22D0F5A4F4A@grabhive.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="JP+T4n/bALQSJXh8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3DB67FAF-E113-47FE-9043-C22D0F5A4F4A@grabhive.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Server-Quench: 3e06e159-efc6-11e2-98a9-0025907ec6c5 X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at: http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR aAdMdwoUEkAYAgsB AmUbWlNeUl97W2o7 ag1VcwRfa1RMVxto VEFWR1pVCwQmQxp4 cWN/LkpydARFfHk+ bUZrWj5YCUR8IEd4 S1MBQz4AeGZhPWIC WUgJfh5UcAFPdx9C PwN5B3ZDAzANdhES HhM4ODE3eDlSNilR RRkIIFQOdA4wJgB0 TREeFjIuG0FSD2Us Jgd0Yn8aAFwWPlg5 MF0uOxoyMgMZDQxY PEBRRiFDLlwMWC0x DkIy X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1020:706 X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255) X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 174.129.28.249/587 X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own anti-virus system. X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Headers-End: 1UzqyV-0003Mc-Rr Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] SPV bitcoind? (was: Introducing BitcoinKit.framework) X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 16:22:42 -0000 --JP+T4n/bALQSJXh8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 03:37:41PM +0200, Wendell wrote: > Peter, >=20 > This sounds like a _very_ good idea for a desktop client, and probably ac= ceptable to users so long as we take available disk space into consideratio= n, and only ever use a fraction of it. >=20 > Will you implement this? I've got one or two orders of magnitude more good ideas than I have time to implement, but I will say this one would have a pretty big impact - I'm considering it. Of course, I would accept bribes. :) But in all seriousness I also accepted funds from John Dillon to implement replace-by-fee, although he's been good in understanding that the scope of the project was quite a bit bigger than originally thought. (it turned out replace-by-fee can enable very safe zero-conf transactions, but only with mempool and relaying changes) I'd suggest looking at my git commit track record before you offer anything FWIW; I've been much more of an academic than a programmer. --=20 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org 0000000000000013030f49fe3eed5e7f9388c4ecc237b7a847ca93255836bc3b --JP+T4n/bALQSJXh8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlHoFkIACgkQpEFN739thoy+ZQCeLbPMZIGo1PPa0tLUoOJu24no 1qoAn3yFaKspUGmzNeuyAecAycXbA0Pe =V7bo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --JP+T4n/bALQSJXh8--