public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Luke-Jr" <luke@dashjr.org>
To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: [Bitcoin-development] LevelDB in master
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 09:39:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201308160939.29864.luke@dashjr.org> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1310 bytes --]

Now-merged pull request #2702 appears to have put the master branch on an 
unofficial Ripple fork of LevelDB, rather than merely updating us to LevelDB 
1.12.0. While Vinnie did somewhat disclose this, I don't see any evidence the 
nature of this was fully understood by others. As I understood the pull 
request, the "Ripple and Bitcoin fork" was just LevelDB with the changes we 
had already made. Mike's comments on the pull request (his audit) suggest that 
this may have been the case in an earlier revision of it. But in fact, there 
appear to be a number of other changes included in what was finally merged a 
few weeks ago. Furthermore, Ripple's fork did not do a proper git merge of 
upstream, thus there is a break in git history, and, more importantly, a 
number of upstream fixes (including some we have had reported to the Bitcoin 
issue tracker) were not included in this merge.

I've pushed three branches to https://github.com/luke-jr/leveldb :
  bitcoin-1.5   Our old/unreleased LevelDB 1.5 fork, for reference
  bitcoin       Our LevelDB 1.7 fork, included in 0.8.x
  bitcoin-up    Our LevelDB 1.7 fork, merged with upstream LevelDB 1.12

A diff from current master (Ripple LevelDB 1.12 fork) to bitcoin-up:
  https://gist.github.com/luke-jr/6248543

Thoughts?

Luke

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 1530 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2013-08-16  9:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-16  9:39 Luke-Jr [this message]
2013-08-16  9:52 ` [Bitcoin-development] LevelDB in master Peter Todd
2013-08-17 20:53   ` Pieter Wuille

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201308160939.29864.luke@dashjr.org \
    --to=luke@dashjr.org \
    --cc=bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox