public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Gavin's post-0.9 TODO list...
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 11:59:51 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130816155951.GA16813@petertodd.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANEZrP3wzMi3oWcwCt-GEs1cXdNa0mzvso_d3htJxaahiewaYw@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2331 bytes --]

On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 05:11:35PM +0200, Mike Hearn wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> wrote:
> 
> > UPNP seems to work well for the reference client. What's the situation
> > there on Android?
> >
> 
> Not sure - it could be investigated. I think UPNP is an entirely
> userspace-implementable protocol, so in theory it could be done by a
> userspace library (even libminiupnp - java is not a requirement on android)

Do find out.

> > I leave my phone plugged in and connected via wifi for most of the day;
> > lots of people do that.
> >
> 
> I suspect you mean "I think lots of people do that". I'm not so sure. We
> could potentially run an experiment in the Android app to measure how many
> users are in a position to contribute back, but just because you have wifi
> doesn't mean you can reconfigure it using UPnP. That helps a lot in home
> networks, but at the office it doesn't help.

Also worth finding out.

> I'm wary of a ton of work being put in to achieve not very much here.
> Satoshi's original vision was always that millions of users were supported
> by 100,000 or so nodes. I don't think that's unreasonable over the long
> term.

Appeal to authority.

Stop bringing up Satoshi's "vision" - our understanding of
crypto-currencies has improved in the 4.5 years since Bitcoin was
released. Satoshi didn't even forsee pool mining, which says a lot about
his economic judgement.

> Besides, prioritisation isn't very hard. Nodes can just hand clients a
> signed timestamp which they remember. When re-connecting, the signed
> timestamp is handed back to the node and it gives priority to those with
> old timestamps. No state is required on the node side. Signing and checking
> can be passed onto the general ECDSA thread pool that works its way through
> pending signature operations, they'd be prioritised lower than checking
> blocks/broadcasts.

Right, so you're giving priority to peers that have been around for
awhile. You've succeeded in forcing attackers to wait a bit.

A) What's the definition of a peer? What stops me from pretending to be
100 peers?

B) Given an attacker willing to wait, what's your plan?

-- 
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
000000000000004a52a297d9ae8ecde2ba62b681cc5a4cfbf7636032fc78e7d0

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-08-16 16:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-16  1:00 [Bitcoin-development] Gavin's post-0.9 TODO list Gavin Andresen
2013-08-16  4:06 ` Melvin Carvalho
2013-08-16 12:11 ` Mike Hearn
2013-08-16 12:24   ` Mike Hearn
2013-08-16 13:41     ` Warren Togami Jr.
2013-08-16 13:46       ` Mike Hearn
2013-08-16 13:53         ` Warren Togami Jr.
2013-08-16 14:06       ` Peter Todd
2013-08-16 14:56       ` Gregory Maxwell
2013-08-16 14:01     ` Peter Todd
2013-08-16 14:15       ` Peter Todd
2013-08-16 14:27         ` Warren Togami Jr.
2013-08-16 14:36           ` Mike Hearn
2013-08-16 14:59             ` Peter Todd
2013-08-16 15:06               ` Warren Togami Jr.
2013-08-16 15:11               ` Mike Hearn
2013-08-16 15:13                 ` Mike Hearn
2013-08-16 15:59                 ` Peter Todd [this message]
2013-08-17  0:08             ` Warren Togami Jr.
2013-08-17 12:35               ` Mike Hearn
2013-08-17 13:41                 ` Jeff Garzik
2013-08-19  3:09         ` John Dillon
2013-08-19  3:17           ` Peter Todd
2013-08-19  5:00             ` John Dillon
2013-08-19  5:34               ` John Dillon
2013-08-19  5:11           ` Mark Friedenbach
2013-08-19  9:16           ` Mike Hearn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130816155951.GA16813@petertodd.org \
    --to=pete@petertodd.org \
    --cc=bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=mike@plan99.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox