From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1VS4P4-0005MI-2b for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 12:22:42 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of leitl.org designates 164.177.174.8 as permitted sender) client-ip=164.177.174.8; envelope-from=eugen@leitl.org; helo=leitl.org; Received: from v8.ativel.com ([164.177.174.8] helo=leitl.org) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) id 1VS4P1-0007r7-U0 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 12:22:42 +0000 Received: by leitl.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C25EB543E97; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 14:22:32 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 14:22:32 +0200 From: Eugen Leitl To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <20131004122232.GL10405@leitl.org> References: <20131004115300.GA22215@savin> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Headers-End: 1VS4P1-0007r7-U0 Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Code review X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 12:22:42 -0000 On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 02:14:19PM +0200, Mike Hearn wrote: > One advantage of using github is that they're an independent third > > party; we should think carefully about the risks of furthering the > > impression that Bitcoin development is a closed process by moving the > > code review it to a server that we control with explicit review groups. > > > > I guess anyone would be able to sign up and comment. It's a long shot, but have any of you looked into Fossil?