public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Luke-Jr" <luke@dashjr.org>
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Revisiting the BIPS process, a proposal
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 19:47:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201310211947.59640.luke@dashjr.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <791a727f-2188-4848-bd77-ea733c8c5c2c@me.com>

On Monday, October 21, 2013 7:38:37 PM Jean-Paul Kogelman wrote:
> 1) Should the protocol specification page also be codified into BIP(s)?

Probably wouldn't hurt, but it'd likely need a rewrite in a more modular and 
formal form.

> 2) Should the current wiki pages be taken down / forwarded to the git repo
> or be auto updated from the git repo?

Since it's the same format, I'd keep it up there, maybe with a link to the git 
repo on the main BIP index wiki page.

> 3) Even though the information in BIP 50 is valuable, should it really be
> considered a BIP?

It's a hardforking protocol change, so IMO yes.



  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-21 19:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-21 14:30 [Bitcoin-development] Revisiting the BIPS process, a proposal Jeff Garzik
2013-10-21 14:34 ` Jeff Garzik
2013-10-21 15:46   ` Andreas Schildbach
2013-10-21 16:14     ` Jeff Garzik
2013-10-21 17:17 ` Jeff Garzik
2013-10-21 19:38   ` Jean-Paul Kogelman
2013-10-21 19:47     ` Luke-Jr [this message]
2013-10-21 20:57       ` Benjamin Cordes
2013-10-21 20:59       ` Benjamin Cordes
2013-10-22  6:39       ` Martin Sustrik
2013-10-22  6:59         ` Jean-Paul Kogelman
2013-10-22  7:03           ` Gregory Maxwell
2013-10-22  7:34             ` Martin Sustrik
2013-10-22  7:49               ` Peter Todd
2013-10-22  7:56               ` Gregory Maxwell
2013-10-22  8:20                 ` Martin Sustrik
2013-10-22 14:08               ` Jeff Garzik
2013-10-23  7:38                 ` Martin Sustrik
2013-10-23 19:40                   ` Peter Todd
2013-10-23 20:05                     ` Martin Sustrik
2013-10-23 20:27                       ` Peter Todd
2013-10-23 21:07                         ` Pieter Wuille
2013-10-23 21:42                           ` Allen Piscitello
2013-10-23 21:49                             ` Luke-Jr
2013-10-24  7:03                           ` Martin Sustrik
2013-10-24 10:39                             ` Jeff Garzik
2013-10-24 11:11                             ` Christian Decker
2013-10-24 19:43                               ` Jeremy Spilman
2013-11-19 16:32 ` Wladimir
2013-11-19 16:53   ` Drak
2013-11-19 17:01     ` Gregory Maxwell
2013-11-19 17:07       ` Drak
2013-11-19 17:45       ` Wladimir
2013-11-19 17:54         ` Gregory Maxwell
2013-11-19 17:06   ` Peter Todd
     [not found]     ` <CA+s+GJA=p+yvoJqUAMQQRcfYK1B8eMVSJDWaXW8o+X5dzCXkdA@mail.gmail.com>
2013-11-19 17:21       ` [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: " Wladimir

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201310211947.59640.luke@dashjr.org \
    --to=luke@dashjr.org \
    --cc=bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox