From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Vpncy-00021V-GV for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 08 Dec 2013 23:19:08 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from zinan.dashjr.org ([192.3.11.21]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1Vpnci-0003Cc-FI for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 08 Dec 2013 23:19:08 +0000 Received: from ishibashi.localnet (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:5:265:be5f:f4ff:febf:4f76]) (Authenticated sender: luke-jr) by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 37F4710803C0; Sun, 8 Dec 2013 23:18:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke-Jr" To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2013 23:18:42 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.12.1-gentoo; KDE/4.10.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <52A3C8A5.7010606@gmail.com> <52A4E199.3000209@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <52A4E199.3000209@gmail.com> X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: E463 A93F 5F31 17EE DE6C 7316 BD02 9424 21F4 889F X-PGP-Key-ID: BD02942421F4889F X-PGP-Keyserver: hkp://pgp.mit.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <201312082318.43516.luke@dashjr.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -0.1 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: bitcoin.org] 0.0 TIME_LIMIT_EXCEEDED Exceeded time limit / deadline X-Headers-End: 1Vpnci-0003Cc-FI Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Dedicated server for bitcoin.org, your thoughts? X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2013 23:19:08 -0000 On Sunday, December 08, 2013 9:16:09 PM Sa=EFvann Carignan wrote: > > 1) Who pays for it? Most obvious answer: Foundation. However there's > > currently a fairly clear line between the foundation website and the > > bitcoin.org website. I personally am fine with the > > bitcoin foundation funding the website, it's a lot closer to the bitcoin > > community than github. But some people might care. So next step would be > > to contact the Foundation board and see if they're willing to fund it. >=20 > Actually I might find way to fund it. But I needed to have ACK & > comments from developers before anything. >=20 > ... > > 4) Who admins it? >=20 > Obviously, I thought it would be important that the server is owned by > someone who can be trusted, with ssh access for all core developers. >=20 > > 5) Who controls DNS for it? >=20 > I'm not sure we'll get any change on this level. I have no idea if the > domain is in good hands, except for the fact that nothing bad happened > thus far. If anything, moving it to core developers (as intended when > the domain was registered) would make more sense IMO. But again, is it > possible, I don't know. I don't think "core developers" should be directly in control here any more= =20 than the Foundation should. Developers are good for development, not=20 necessarily web or server admin tasks. Only those directly involved in the= =20 needed roles should have access IMO. Luke