From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Wd3N7-0001kT-4F for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 20:02:21 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from zinan.dashjr.org ([192.3.11.21]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1Wd3N5-0001jb-AG for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 20:02:21 +0000 Received: from ishibashi.localnet (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:5:265:be5f:f4ff:febf:4f76]) (Authenticated sender: luke-jr) by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8626B1080111; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 20:02:49 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke-Jr" To: Tamas Blummer Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 20:02:11 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.12.6-gentoo; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <201404231955.09287.luke@dashjr.org> <26C186B9-B60D-4092-BA78-7039B23B7AE1@bitsofproof.com> In-Reply-To: <26C186B9-B60D-4092-BA78-7039B23B7AE1@bitsofproof.com> X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: E463 A93F 5F31 17EE DE6C 7316 BD02 9424 21F4 889F X-PGP-Key-ID: BD02942421F4889F X-PGP-Keyserver: hkp://pgp.mit.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201404232002.12688.luke@dashjr.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Headers-End: 1Wd3N5-0001jb-AG Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] New BIP32 structure X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 20:02:21 -0000 On Wednesday, April 23, 2014 8:01:16 PM Tamas Blummer wrote: > On 23.04.2014, at 21:55, Luke-Jr wrote: > > Any wallet should import all the coins just fine, it just wouldn't *use* > > any account other than 0. Remember addresses are used to receive > > bitcoins; once the UTXOs are in the wallet, they are no longer > > associated with the address or any other details of how they were > > received. > > This is a bit idealistic. > The wallet has to know how it got the UTXO in order to be able to spend it. No it doesn't... Just the assigned scriptPubKey and secret(s) required to satisfy it.