From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <pete@petertodd.org>) id 1XeRj6-0004RD-35 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 16:47:04 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of petertodd.org designates 62.13.148.102 as permitted sender) client-ip=62.13.148.102; envelope-from=pete@petertodd.org; helo=outmail148102.authsmtp.net; Received: from outmail148102.authsmtp.net ([62.13.148.102]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1XeRj4-0002pV-NX for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 16:47:04 +0000 Received: from mail-c235.authsmtp.com (mail-c235.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.235]) by punt14.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id s9FGkrQ7032718; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 17:46:53 +0100 (BST) Received: from savin.petertodd.org (75-119-251-161.dsl.teksavvy.com [75.119.251.161]) (authenticated bits=128) by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id s9FGkmUc037488 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 15 Oct 2014 17:46:51 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 12:47:12 -0400 From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> To: Adam Back <adam@cypherspace.org> Message-ID: <20141015164712.GA28150@savin.petertodd.org> References: <CA+s+GJCAWXgpzyQnAar6ecKdcci+tdR8yJjCOUpB=xmj-ytZZQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABsx9T1U10R4t9NNO9rSSfBxcpOLQNvKFC=7fRKa5Tq41+67cQ@mail.gmail.com> <CANEZrP1yFOWcJUr+ML73Eoqa=EvYRZivkogdrFdww+5QsOXhBw@mail.gmail.com> <CALqxMTErVtN2bj7s=DiX4ajzMtQ=M+_DCFQ0=jT6QWUVaXwY_w@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <CALqxMTErVtN2bj7s=DiX4ajzMtQ=M+_DCFQ0=jT6QWUVaXwY_w@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Server-Quench: dd138f1e-548a-11e4-b396-002590a15da7 X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at: http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR aQdMdwcUF1YAAgsB AmIbWlNeVFt7XGI7 bA9PbARUfEhLXhtr VklWR1pVCwQmQhV3 cUVDN0pydAJCcHY+ ZEZhVnAVCBB7dk4r QxtJEGkONHphaTUb TRJbfgVJcANIexZF O1F6ACIKLwdSbGoL NQ4vNDcwO3BTJTpY RgYVKF8UXXNDNB8E DwgYGj4iBlZt X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1023:706 X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255) X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 75.119.251.161/587 X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own anti-virus system. X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Headers-End: 1XeRj4-0002pV-NX Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP process X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development> List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net> List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>, <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 16:47:04 -0000 --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 04:54:57PM +0100, Adam Back wrote: > please not google groups *, I'd vote for sourceforge or other simple > open list software over google groups. >=20 > Adam >=20 > * Google lists are somehow a little proprietary or gmail lockin > focused eg it makes things extra hard to subscribe with a non-google > address if google has any hint that your address is associated with a > gmail account. Quite frustrating. I'll second that request. Something mailman based; don't particularly care where it's hosted. After all, one of the big advantages of open mailing lists is that multiple third-parties can easily provide archives, for instance www.mail-archive.com --=20 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org 00000000000000000a91d3bbf16d2b80e142f98e6ff45b615f668dba558a4413 --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGrBAEBCACVBQJUPqUMXhSAAAAAABUAQGJsb2NraGFzaEBiaXRjb2luLm9yZzAw MDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwYTkxZDNiYmYxNmQyYjgwZTE0MmY5OGU2ZmY0NWI2MTVm NjY4ZGJhNTU4YTQ0MTMvFIAAAAAAFQARcGthLWFkZHJlc3NAZ251cGcub3JncGV0 ZUBwZXRlcnRvZC5vcmcACgkQJIFAPaXwkfuYLAf8DZIDpLOwmVohT6IdjPzC1qnZ KC5kiqY51pd9U+AUwXvcVUBVuUACuKoSIDcN7tTnYuwcccPVF8gJhKOEirxJbMBn EsZbyFQ881gCiuVQ5svJFt/nPNLHZ55FJq//kX/BFgtO8CFgaemuyNSQeNpHDaQM uT664zq/Ru7mFc4/Uu6uXSEwy+obqlDMf3Pl0PlsNjyoJINrABa1oNTRSQp4kIlQ 8i5T751xMW3Z7yBX+74mbp95CMSzwdn8Xi9lo+aYIstQmzCm0TN58t1wCddyvhCs fiRKSSvS0abnyr79WyPIDbcOQKA49KolSLLk0V2hWmJaF75Se3vHM6fburtHug== =/vJU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1--