From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1XiJa6-0006YR-P0 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 08:53:46 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of dashjr.org designates 192.3.11.21 as permitted sender) client-ip=192.3.11.21; envelope-from=luke@dashjr.org; helo=zinan.dashjr.org; Received: from zinan.dashjr.org ([192.3.11.21]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1XiJa5-0001ez-Nc for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 08:53:46 +0000 Received: from ishibashi.localnet (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:5:265:61b6:56a6:b03d:28d6]) (Authenticated sender: luke-jr) by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 35F72108039F; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 08:53:40 +0000 (UTC) From: Luke Dashjr To: Wladimir Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 08:53:37 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.17.1-gentoo-r1; KDE/4.12.5; x86_64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: E463 A93F 5F31 17EE DE6C 7316 BD02 9424 21F4 889F X-PGP-Key-ID: BD02942421F4889F X-PGP-Keyserver: hkp://pgp.mit.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201410260853.38850.luke@dashjr.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Headers-End: 1XiJa5-0001ez-Nc Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin Core 0.10 release schedule X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 08:53:47 -0000 On Sunday, October 26, 2014 7:57:12 AM Wladimir wrote: > Let me know if there is anything else you think is ready (and not too > risky) to be in 0.10. At the very least, we need: #5106 Bugfix: submitblock: Use a temporary CValidationState to determine ... #5103 CreateNewBlock and miner_tests: Also check generated template is ... #5078 Bugfix: CreateNewBlock: Check that active chain has a valid tip ... (or at least some conclusion for the problem discussed therein) Harmless/No reason not to have: #3727 RPC: submitblock: Support for returning specific rejection reasons #1816 Support for BIP 23 block proposal #5144 Qt: Elaborate on signverify message dialog warning #5071 Introduce CNodePolicy for putting isolated node policy code and ... (futher commits exist that should ideally get in after this is merged) Debatable (but harmless, and miners seem to want it): #5077 Enable customising node policy for datacarrier data size with a ... Luke