From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Y5iyZ-0004P8-31 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 22:39:47 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of dashjr.org designates 85.234.147.28 as permitted sender) client-ip=85.234.147.28; envelope-from=luke@dashjr.org; helo=zinan.dashjr.org; Received: from 85-234-147-28.static.as29550.net ([85.234.147.28] helo=zinan.dashjr.org) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1Y5iyX-0002iW-QD for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 22:39:47 +0000 Received: from ishibashi.localnet (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:5:265:61b6:56a6:b03d:28d6]) (Authenticated sender: luke-jr) by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E515C1086896; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 22:36:50 +0000 (UTC) X-Hashcash: 1:25:141229:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net::hRPwdzPpGWAd+124:fcCOY X-Hashcash: 1:25:141229:mike@plan99.net::AgSgGh4BEeFLLFCj:bpEAW X-Hashcash: 1:25:141229:sergiolerner@certimix.com::RRx8kE8R9qDZYH7h:bB9w/ From: Luke Dashjr To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 22:36:48 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.14.27-gentoo; KDE/4.12.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <54A1A99E.1020604@certimix.com> In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: E463 A93F 5F31 17EE DE6C 7316 BD02 9424 21F4 889F X-PGP-Key-ID: BD02942421F4889F X-PGP-Keyserver: hkp://pgp.mit.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201412292236.49596.luke@dashjr.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Headers-End: 1Y5iyX-0002iW-QD Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP: Voluntary deposit bonds X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 22:39:47 -0000 On Monday, December 29, 2014 9:10:20 PM Mike Hearn wrote: > How does adding inputs to a coinbase differ from just having pay-to-fee > transactions in the block? Pay-to-fee transactions can be "stolen" by another block at the same or greater height. Additional inputs to the generation transaction are tied to that block alone. Luke