public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Isidor Zeuner <cryptocurrencies@quidecco.de>
To: Tamas Blummer <tamas@bitsofproof.com>
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Merged mining a side chain with proof of	burn	on parent chain
Date: Wed,  4 Feb 2015 14:54:43 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150204135443.2907FE2DCAD@quidecco.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <709AAA00-A40A-42EF-A17D-9B3E07FE902A@bitsofproof.com>

Hi there,

comments in-line:

> > I later wrote up the idea in the context of adding Zerocoin to
> > Bitcoin:
> >
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net/msg02472.html
> >

For the sake of maximum clarity with respect to modelling the value of
a Bitcoin, I don't think that approaches which change the number
of coins that can possibly be circulated should be encouraged.

So, I like the idea of having the "sacrificed" coins appearing in the
mining fees in a future block. But what is meant with OP_DEPTH in this
context? From what I read, this operation just manipulates the stack
size when evaluating the script, so I don't see how it would
affect miner incentives.

Best regards,

Isidor



  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-02-04 13:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-09 21:14 [Bitcoin-development] ACK NACK utACK "Concept ACK" Sergio Lerner
2014-12-09 21:30 ` Matt Corallo
2014-12-10  6:47   ` Wladimir
2014-12-10  7:35     ` [Bitcoin-development] Merged mining a side chain with proof of burn on parent chain Tamas Blummer
2014-12-10  8:30       ` patrick
2014-12-16  9:55         ` Alex Mizrahi
2014-12-16 12:36           ` Peter Todd
2014-12-15 14:55       ` Isidor Zeuner
2014-12-16  8:28         ` Tamas Blummer
2014-12-16 12:30       ` Tamas Blummer
2014-12-18 16:23         ` Tamas Blummer
2014-12-10  8:21     ` [Bitcoin-development] ACK NACK utACK "Concept ACK" Wladimir
2014-12-10 15:45       ` Austin Walne
2014-12-17  8:44         ` Wladimir
2014-12-10 15:52     ` Jeff Garzik
2014-12-16 23:40       ` Btc Drak
2014-12-11 12:09     ` [Bitcoin-development] Merged mining a side chain with proof of burn on parent chain Isidor Zeuner
2014-12-11 14:56       ` Tamas Blummer
2014-12-15 10:21         ` Tamas Blummer
2014-12-15 12:39           ` Peter Todd
2014-12-15 13:06             ` Tamas Blummer
2015-02-04 13:54             ` Isidor Zeuner [this message]
2015-02-06  1:34               ` Peter Todd

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150204135443.2907FE2DCAD@quidecco.de \
    --to=cryptocurrencies@quidecco.de \
    --cc=bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=tamas@bitsofproof.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox