From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1YN2sk-0002qd-Ry for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 17:21:22 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of petertodd.org designates 62.13.149.80 as permitted sender) client-ip=62.13.149.80; envelope-from=pete@petertodd.org; helo=outmail149080.authsmtp.com; Received: from outmail149080.authsmtp.com ([62.13.149.80]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1YN2sj-0007Pb-6Z for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 17:21:22 +0000 Received: from mail-c237.authsmtp.com (mail-c237.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.237]) by punt17.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t1FHLDg2007023; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 17:21:13 GMT Received: from savin.petertodd.org (75-119-251-161.dsl.teksavvy.com [75.119.251.161]) (authenticated bits=128) by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t1FHL9Yl013715 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 15 Feb 2015 17:21:11 GMT Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 12:21:09 -0500 From: Peter Todd To: Tamas Blummer Message-ID: <20150215172108.GA27520@savin.petertodd.org> References: <54DE7601.4070509@voskuil.org> <54DF07A5.1060004@voskuil.org> <54DF2E80.5060506@voskuil.org> <20150214131320.GA26731@savin.petertodd.org> <3D4F2E23-CADE-4FE7-B960-3F79815E868C@bitsofproof.com> <20150215170228.GB21269@savin.petertodd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Server-Quench: 09e08030-b537-11e4-9f74-002590a135d3 X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at: http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR aAdMdwcUHlAWAgsB AmMbWlNeUlx7WGE7 bA9PbARUfEhLXhtr VklWR1pVCwQmRR13 fmIXO0VydgZBeXs+ bENqWz5bVRF6fUZ+ QlMGEG4BeGZhPWQC WRZfcx5UcAFPdx8U a1N6AHBDAzANdhES HhM4ODE3eDlSNilR RRkIIFQOdA4sGHYG Sg8YHCkuG0JNbSQv JBsnLBZcA08Ken8/ YxMSfVMSOR4OAQpf GXQvSBRQO14aRytj BgdbUEgCQnVcWm9V ShMvOBwAGjVJRmIA QhIdAwkIEDhEWi1F H3c1 X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1024:706 X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255) X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 75.119.251.161/587 X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own anti-virus system. X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Headers-End: 1YN2sj-0007Pb-6Z Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] On Rewriting Bitcoin (was Re: [Libbitcoin] Satoshi client: is a fork past 0.10 possible?) X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 17:21:23 -0000 --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 06:13:06PM +0100, Tamas Blummer wrote: >=20 > On Feb 15, 2015, at 6:02 PM, Peter Todd wrote: > > Yes you are dicking around. >=20 > I thought I was clear, that I am using Bitcoin Core as border router talk= ing to its P2P interface. Ah, sorry, that wasn't clear to me. > The reimplementation of consensus code helped me to deeply understand the= protocol, aids debugging > and now comes handy to create a side chain. Indeed, which is why I've done a lot of work on a reimplementation of the Bitcoin scripting system as well: https://github.com/petertodd/python-bitcoinlib/blob/master/bitcoin/core/scr= ipteval.py Which has this cheery warning at the top: """Script evaluation Be warned that there are highly likely to be consensus bugs in this code; it is unlikely to match Satoshi Bitcoin exactly. Think carefully before using this module. """ I'll be adding a FFI interface to libconsensus in the future... and I probably should make that warning scarier... --=20 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org 000000000000000000ffb7a576b7aa5236c53f51ec07ccf174067beed3398056 --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGrBAEBCACVBQJU4NWAXhSAAAAAABUAQGJsb2NraGFzaEBiaXRjb2luLm9yZzAw MDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwZTRhYTVkNGM4OWMyNzYzMjFmMTQ4MGFmNjU4NGM1MWEw NTEyZmNkNDgzZGYzY2YvFIAAAAAAFQARcGthLWFkZHJlc3NAZ251cGcub3JncGV0 ZUBwZXRlcnRvZC5vcmcACgkQJIFAPaXwkftzagf/TH0sNvfrVulFM/ONjQH5vgZA 2D6FDvBG59kZCrWBzAA2N4YOW+D+QdCoo82bMwHa9pXfb2FSmuLHdyZK5JpE5Pwc aIlLROtPBnO1mXnFjzdbfBWCTjYTIeSl6G7EU6eI7lq5vOCyS4xXzRmklpZLzf3c 2H0c7DzKfJN1pfPkKK1azluozICFDydYiSUhMe4SLCHmvTrad+NZz5Kc96IJm4u+ xpKTqyOpPZm6VxFaGi0XPIliTBT1fMe6mGH8zpG6qPdtS4kajkukexO6M6UeEIyc DSmPSxYn0R2Gutqj/s5+zFzBlpT7bNsdlI+usTptydutZKZKRwg47T6dk8hvfQ== =Spfp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s--