From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] CLTV opcode allocation; long-term plans?
Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 13:17:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150507171732.GA6033@savin.petertodd.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87lhh188zw.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 983 bytes --]
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 11:05:47AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> writes:
> > That said, if people have strong feelings about this, I would be willing
> > to make OP_CLTV work as follows:
> >
> > <nLockTime> 1 OP_CLTV
> >
> > Where the 1 selects absolute mode, and all others act as OP_NOP's. A
> > future relative CLTV could then be a future soft-fork implemented as
> > follows:
> >
> > <relative nLockTime> 2 OP_CLTV
>
> Mildly prefer to put that the other way around.
>
> ie. the OP_NOP1 becomes OP_EXTENSION_PREFIX, the next op defines which
> extended opcode it is (must be a push).
There's no good way to implement that option - when the OP_NOPx is
executed all that's available to it without a lot of complex work is
what's already been pushed to the stack, not what will be pushed to the
stack in the future.
--
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
000000000000000002761482983864328320badf24d137101fab9a5861a59d30
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 650 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-07 17:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-04 5:07 [Bitcoin-development] CLTV opcode allocation; long-term plans? Peter Todd
2015-05-05 0:54 ` Btc Drak
2015-05-09 9:12 ` Peter Todd
2015-05-12 19:16 ` Jorge Timón
2015-05-12 19:23 ` Pieter Wuille
2015-05-12 19:30 ` Btc Drak
2015-05-12 20:38 ` Luke Dashjr
2015-05-12 21:01 ` Peter Todd
2015-05-13 0:38 ` Jorge Timón
2015-05-07 1:35 ` Rusty Russell
2015-05-07 17:17 ` Peter Todd [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150507171732.GA6033@savin.petertodd.org \
--to=pete@petertodd.org \
--cc=bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox