From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Z2lYB-0003f9-9j for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 19:20:35 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of petertodd.org designates 62.13.148.154 as permitted sender) client-ip=62.13.148.154; envelope-from=pete@petertodd.org; helo=outmail148154.authsmtp.co.uk; Received: from outmail148154.authsmtp.co.uk ([62.13.148.154]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1Z2lYA-0006N4-3w for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 19:20:35 +0000 Received: from mail-c235.authsmtp.com (mail-c235.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.235]) by punt15.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t5AJKD3C088435; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 20:20:13 +0100 (BST) Received: from savin.petertodd.org (75-119-251-161.dsl.teksavvy.com [75.119.251.161]) (authenticated bits=128) by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t5AJK5r3001181 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 10 Jun 2015 20:20:07 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 15:20:04 -0400 From: Peter Todd To: Andy Schroder Message-ID: <20150610192004.GB21416@savin.petertodd.org> References: <1943127.DBnVxmfOIh@1337h4x0r> <20150610093556.GA11409@amethyst.visucore.com> <557869F9.8030109@AndySchroder.com> <557883A7.7030906@sky-ip.org> <55788924.6090008@AndySchroder.com> <20150610190320.GA1229@savin.petertodd.org> <55788C02.1010105@AndySchroder.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2B/JsCI69OhZNC5r" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55788C02.1010105@AndySchroder.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Server-Quench: b4e1059d-0fa5-11e5-b396-002590a15da7 X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at: http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR bwdMdwIUEkAaAgsB AmMbWVReUl17WWs7 bA9PbARUfEhLXhtr VklWR1pVCwQmRRlw fGUbEBpydwRHcH8+ ZEBqXHQVDkAvdEZ4 SxpJFTtXYHphaTUa TRJbfgVJcANIexZF O1F6ACIKLwdSbGoL NQ4vNDcwO3BTJTpY RgYVKF8UXXNDPyV0 fBcfBz4iM0ofSCh7 NAAnLlpUAFwMKVkt NkE9WUNQPhkVFwJe V11KYmdZIEIdDzYr DBgSWU8FDGo1 X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1023:706 X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255) X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 75.119.251.161/587 X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own anti-virus system. X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Headers-End: 1Z2lYA-0006N4-3w Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Is SourceForge still trustworthy enough to host this list? X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 19:20:35 -0000 --2B/JsCI69OhZNC5r Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 03:12:02PM -0400, Andy Schroder wrote: >=20 > Andy Schroder >=20 > On 06/10/2015 03:03 PM, Peter Todd wrote: > > > >>4. Seems like digital signatures are always broken on messages because > >> the list server slightly modifies them (?), so my e-mail client > >> doesn't verify them all. > >What type of digital signatures specifically? What email client? >=20 > I think they are usually PGP/MIME signatures that are not working > right. If you'll notice from my e-mail headers: >=20 > User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thund= erbird/24.2.0 > X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 It might be that Thunderbird doesn't properly handle messages with both signed and unsigned content. I use mutt myself, which handles it just fine. (the sigs on your emails verify just fine for instance) --=20 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org 0000000000000000134f9a433a4bece258b5035ecda33384f820a60493ca2887 --2B/JsCI69OhZNC5r Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGrBAEBCACVBQJVeI3hXhSAAAAAABUAQGJsb2NraGFzaEBiaXRjb2luLm9yZzAw MDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAxMzRmOWE0MzNhNGJlY2UyNThiNTAzNWVjZGEzMzM4NGY4 MjBhNjA0OTNjYTI4ODcvFIAAAAAAFQARcGthLWFkZHJlc3NAZ251cGcub3JncGV0 ZUBwZXRlcnRvZC5vcmcACgkQJIFAPaXwkftHlwf8DGCeh8bILCbick3vyiT8e4u0 bdj+c62UWvyijbjeK6Ce1wgtTYbrQs85pdT/tzGDguyRdHtKiZhkzBd4DR8bXFiS NMdZn9zQgyeArt7EQ5plePXiBLmBKtcC4kIbDv8H3jhYrBHkS0qSzUBCvsytVlH/ Su5B1/Dt0X2OeXFK8f/2tSUCtlXb7xTpexA4puyLwXq5HQ5cVJUgwKK4wBRm30fy hD3lEJlMLeFtYtmvCzdJKnP9c5ksUXzY2VmDspmetA/Jg32FVM29EUVr7ODDoqK8 gkr/y8TsGOdlAIZh7vXLh7Ehqnvot/WOXbylRLD+ALUB49Rtx83qkQC9rInHUw== =vZn8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2B/JsCI69OhZNC5r--