Re: [Bitcoin-development] Is SourceForge still trustworthy enough to host this list?

[Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1420 bytes --]

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 03:36:42PM -0400, Andy Schroder wrote:
> It's possible that the enigmail extension is not working right, but
> I was under the impression that it is just feeding data to gpg and
> then receiving the response back. It's possible that your e-mail you
> just checked was not sent through mailman since I also replied
> directly to you explicitly (in which case the message has not been
> modified) and you probably have the setting in the mailing list set
> to not send duplicate messages if you are an explicit TO. I just
> deleted all explicit TOs for this message, so everyone should be
> receiving it through the mailing list and not directly. Is the
> signature still valid for you now? I think enigmail can handle

It has perfectly valid signatures, as do your earlier messages to the
list.

> messages with some signed and unsigned content, and maybe PGP/MIME
> inherently does not support this and a mailing list re-writing parts
> of messages is an expected action? If this message re-writing is an
> expected action and I'm correct that PGP/MIME does not support
> partially signed content, then maybe it is just a recommendation for
> this mailing list to not use PGP/MIME for messages sent to the list?

PGP/MIME definitely does support partially signed content.

-- 
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
000000000000000009e865d07f75341a5f3dc15f0e149055a241eedd552c3b88

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 650 bytes --]