From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org> Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE7179FB for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 19:30:47 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from outmail149077.authsmtp.com (outmail149077.authsmtp.com [62.13.149.77]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12D4911E for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 19:30:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-c235.authsmtp.com (mail-c235.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.235]) by punt15.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t5QJUbaL070756; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 20:30:37 +0100 (BST) Received: from muck (static-71-247-144-172.nycmny.east.verizon.net [71.247.144.172]) (authenticated bits=128) by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t5QJUVEf015564 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 26 Jun 2015 20:30:35 +0100 (BST) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 15:30:31 -0400 From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> To: Pindar Wong <pindar.wong@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20150626193031.GA17829@muck> References: <CALqxMTGBt7MNs5YWf8QzKe+4Fr-uKVimf8=VbytBANEDm=s50g@mail.gmail.com> <CANEZrP31AEson9DZ=ZU7d4t=DvmGodh1ja6EaZ6xQZ3bFEXeVA@mail.gmail.com> <CALqxMTFC7zBN9GvHAZLQj4SbXjzkCAM9meSErd3qn7uCoON98Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAM7BtUoNJ3vPqW9esCBo8XSN=yRjC3oheP_hd_kcgzs0_0De6w@mail.gmail.com> <20150616133305.GA30988@muck> <CAM7BtUr1zmw_Jmyn8ULZ=Jb-pkAwUwvBK68UWmzeJH3kAmYEhA@mail.gmail.com> <20150617035959.GB23826@muck> <CAM7BtUqCZSGfgF7Xq4g7ZCrB-nrsur8B78myDd+NBsqZ0S_rZw@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <CAM7BtUqCZSGfgF7Xq4g7ZCrB-nrsur8B78myDd+NBsqZ0S_rZw@mail.gmail.com> X-Server-Quench: d24b44f5-1c39-11e5-b396-002590a15da7 X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at: http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR bAdMdAQUEkAaAgsB AmMbWVReU117WmQ7 bAtPbwFafEtKWxtr V0pWR1pVCwQmRRlg fHt4J09ydgBDfno+ Z0BkWXAVCEZ+J0J5 FEtJFD4FbHphaTUa TRJbfgVJcANIexZF O1F6ACIKLwdSbGoL NQ4vNDcwO3BTJTpY RgYVKF8UXXNDByMx XAwDGjM0VUQPQDgv ZxYnNlUbHUBUAnl6 OlwtVBoWNAURQkM8 V0dKBmpSIF8aSiww EBgSXUcEHHhTRj1f agAA X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1023:706 X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255) X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 71.247.144.172/587 X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own anti-virus system. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: Constance Choi <constance.choi@gmail.com>, Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>, Primavera De Filippi <pdefilippi@gmail.com>, bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Bitcoin-development] questions about bitcoin-XT code fork & non-consensus hard-fork X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 19:30:47 -0000 --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 02:43:19PM +0800, Pindar Wong wrote: > > Yup, though keep in mind the regulatory question is more than just how > > your local jurisdiction views Bitcoin, but rather how your customers' > > jurisdictions view Bitcoin. > > > > Of course, when I say "customers" above, I mean the entire Bitcoin > > community that is ultimately buying the new coins produced by miners and > > paying fees to them! > > >=20 > I'm sorry for the distraction with the mailing list problems. >=20 > Taking an ecosystem view, the miners are important, so are all the other > participants who rely on it and invest time, effort and energy to make > Bitcoin work and work well. Agreed. IMO any change to the blocksize needs explicit mechanisms to let all Bitcoin holders have a say in it. > I am in contact with Primavera and it would appear that the Cyberport is > available for use on October 14 and 15 (Wed/Thursday). Great! Glad to hear. > Last November, this was where the Global Bitcoin Summit (Hong Kong) > <http://www.cyberport.hk/en/about_cyberport/our_5_centres/collaboration_c= entre/collaboration_news/2146> > was hosted with the participation of many of China's leading > Bitcoin-related companies. There is a meeting now in Shanghai. >=20 > It would be an honour to host a more technical meeting to discuss BIP100, > 101 et al. should be interest to do so. Are you thinking this more technical meeting should be before or after the October event? Perhaps a better question, is what exactly do you see being discussed at a technical meeting? --=20 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org 0000000000000000007fc13ce02072d9cb2a6d51fae41fefcde7b3b283803d24 --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGrBAEBCACVBQJVjahUXhSAAAAAABUAQGJsb2NraGFzaEBiaXRjb2luLm9yZzAw MDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDdmYzEzY2UwMjA3MmQ5Y2IyYTZkNTFmYWU0MWZlZmNk ZTdiM2IyODM4MDNkMjQvFIAAAAAAFQARcGthLWFkZHJlc3NAZ251cGcub3JncGV0 ZUBwZXRlcnRvZC5vcmcACgkQwIXyHOf0udxT6Qf/RHAXStpbC/akZavkE+1uqDXQ YVrJtijZNDuu0FyEjy6x3TLIFKl9+hoIwfAj9DHMQUHhYd9hpf7MgCXv4pYXy9W2 XDthX7UjkPduOtepwcrMZZNGWT7bbDaP8H5eVHV/bG6RZhMbFVNOBn4j2veDnqIP CnsMOveUm9xwofVA5tRaK2JJD+2MozBpTJqjvpfjJtyivRwY6YBA6AEI/JtpaqNm Ri6jF3RVSklgHnZonERZgYKtFYuscKMVsaW50Glujzn0zfTWAfC1etgqvehHzz1M aRMuuRzi98XryMR4GY466YFqszYK3wwpfw54jXYVZWeLClfMK7qril+ClrcB+w== =KnbM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk--